Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097922›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Diagnostic accuracy of the 'Dysphagia Screening Tool for Geriatric Patients' (DSTG) compared to Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for assessing dysphagia in hospitalized geriatric patients - a diagnostic study.

Ulrich Thiem, Martin Jäger, Holger Stege, Rainer Wirth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a neurogeriatric syndrome].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrich ThiemAlbertinen-Haus Hamburg, Sellhopsweg 18-22, 22459, Hamburg, Germany. ulrich.thiem@immanuelalbertinen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2181-6872
Martin JägerHüttenhospital gemeinnützige GmbH, Am Marksbach 28, 44269, Dortmund, Germany.
Holger StegeDepartment of Geriatrics, ukrb University Clinic Ruppin-Brandenburg, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany.
Rainer WirthDepartment of Geriatrics, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOropharyngeal dysphagia is highly prevalent among hospitalized geriatric patients. The screening instruments used to date have been evaluated primarily in stroke patients. This diagnostic study aimed to validate a new screening instrument for oropharyngeal dysphagia, the 'Dysphagia Screening Tool for Geriatric Patients' (DSTG), as compared to one of the gold standards, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). MATERIALS AND

methodsGeriatric inpatients admitted to five geriatric hospitals in Germany were consecutively evaluated using both DSTG and FEES in random order and by different evaluators blinded to the results of the other evaluation. In the FEES examination, a score of more than 3 on Rosenbek's Penetration Aspiration Scale was considered evidence of clinically relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia. Sensitivity, specificity and further measures of test performance were calculated for DSTG.

resultsThe 53 volunteers recruited were on average 85 years of age, 56.6% were women. Twenty patients (37.7%) were diagnosed with dysphagia using FEES. Of these, 12 were screened as positive on DSTG. Of the 33 FEES negative patients, 4 tested positive on DSTG. The following test parameters were calculated for DSTG: sensitivity: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [0.39 ; 0.78], specificity 0.88 [0.73 ; 0.95], positive predictive value 0.75 [0.51 ; 0.90], negative predictive value 0.78 [0.63 ; 0.89], positive likelihood ratio 4.95 [1.85 ; 13.27], negative likelihood ratio 0.46 [0.26 ; 0.79]. In a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.77 [0.62 ; 0.91]. No adverse events occurred.

conclusionThe DSTG appears to be a valid instrument for screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia in geriatric inpatients.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersAgedDeglutitionFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsDeglutitionDeglutition disorderDiagnostic testDysphagiaFlexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowingGeriatric assessmentGeriatricsSwallowing disorder

Identifiers

PMID38097922
PMCPMC10722677
OpenAlexW4389727126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.