Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097857›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024

Deep learning algorithm for predicting preterm birth in the case of threatened preterm labor admissions using transvaginal ultrasound.

Ai Ohtaka, Munetoshi Akazawa, Kazunori Hashimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ai OhtakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 2-1-10 Kohoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Munetoshi AkazawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 2-1-10 Kohoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan. navirez@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-8546
Kazunori HashimotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 2-1-10 Kohoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreterm birth presents a major challenge in perinatal care, and predicting preterm birth remains a major challenge. If preterm birth cases can be accurately predicted during pregnancy, preventive interventions and more intensive prenatal monitoring may be possible. Deep learning has the capability to extract image parameters or features related to diseases. We constructed a deep learning model to predict preterm births using transvaginal ultrasound images.

methodsPatients who were hospitalized for threatened preterm labor or shortened cervical length were enrolled. We used images of the cervix obtained via transvaginal ultrasound examination at admission to predict cases of preterm birth. We used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformer (Vit) for the model construction. We compared the prediction performance of deep learning models with two human experts.

resultsA total of 59 patients were enrolled in the study, including 30 cases in the preterm group and 29 cases in the full-term group. Statistical analysis of clinical variables including cervical length showed no significant differences between the two groups. For accuracy, the best CNN model had the highest accuracy of 0.718 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704, followed by Vision Transformer with accuracy of 0.645 and AUC of 0.587. The accuracy of two human experts was 0.465 and 0.517, respectively.

conclusionsDeep learning models have important implications for extraction of features that provide more accurate assessment of preterm birth than traditional visual assessment by the human eye.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPremature BirthAdultAlgorithmsCervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerObstetric Labor, PrematurePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalDeep learningPreterm birthTransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38097857
OpenAlexW4389792187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.