ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024
Deep learning algorithm for predicting preterm birth in the case of threatened preterm labor admissions using transvaginal ultrasound.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in preterm birth prediction: a narrative review of current approaches and clinical applicability.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- AI-assisted point of care ultrasound and an innovative vaginal speculum: a proposed combined approach to reducing spontaneous preterm birth.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePreterm birth presents a major challenge in perinatal care, and predicting preterm birth remains a major challenge. If preterm birth cases can be accurately predicted during pregnancy, preventive interventions and more intensive prenatal monitoring may be possible. Deep learning has the capability to extract image parameters or features related to diseases. We constructed a deep learning model to predict preterm births using transvaginal ultrasound images.
methodsPatients who were hospitalized for threatened preterm labor or shortened cervical length were enrolled. We used images of the cervix obtained via transvaginal ultrasound examination at admission to predict cases of preterm birth. We used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformer (Vit) for the model construction. We compared the prediction performance of deep learning models with two human experts.
resultsA total of 59 patients were enrolled in the study, including 30 cases in the preterm group and 29 cases in the full-term group. Statistical analysis of clinical variables including cervical length showed no significant differences between the two groups. For accuracy, the best CNN model had the highest accuracy of 0.718 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704, followed by Vision Transformer with accuracy of 0.645 and AUC of 0.587. The accuracy of two human experts was 0.465 and 0.517, respectively.
conclusionsDeep learning models have important implications for extraction of features that provide more accurate assessment of preterm birth than traditional visual assessment by the human eye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.