Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097720›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2024

Ventral wing hairs provide tactile feedback for aerial prey capture in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Brittney L Boublil, Chao Yu, Grant Shewmaker, Susanne Sterbing, Cynthia F Moss

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Brittney L BoublilDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Ames 200B, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-9928
Chao YuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Ames 200B, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Grant ShewmakerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Ames 200B, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Susanne SterbingDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Ames 200B, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Cynthia F MossDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Ames 200B, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. cynthia.moss@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-14-1-0398NIFTINational Science Foundation 2011619Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats rely on their hand-wings to execute agile flight maneuvers, to grasp objects, and cradle young. Embedded in the dorsal and ventral membranes of bat wings are microscopic hairs. Past research findings implicate dorsal wing hairs in airflow sensing for flight control, but the function of ventral wing hairs has not been previously investigated. Here, we test the hypothesis that ventral wing hairs carry mechanosensory signals for flight control, prey capture, and handling. To test this hypothesis, we used synchronized high-speed stereo video and audio recordings to quantify flight and echolocation behaviors of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) engaged in an aerial insect capture task. We analyzed prey-capture strategy and performance, along with flight kinematics, before and after depilation of microscopic hairs from the bat's ventral wing and tail membranes. We found that ventral wing hair depilation significantly impaired the bat's prey-capture performance. Interestingly, ventral wing hair depilation also produced increases in the bat's flight speed, an effect previously attributed exclusively to airflow sensing along the dorsal wing surface. These findings demonstrate that microscopic hairs embedded in the ventral wing and tail membranes of insectivorous bats provide mechanosensory feedback for prey handling and flight control.

Indexed as

ChiropteraHairPredatory BehaviorSensationWings, AnimalAnimalsEcholocationFemaleFlight, AnimalInsectaMaleVideo RecordingEcholocationMechanosensorsSensory feedback controlSensory hairs

Identifiers

PMID38097720
OpenAlexW4389725620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.