ArticleScientific reports2023
Optimized sample buffer for dispersed, high-resolution capillary zone electrophoretic separation of Escherichia coli B.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) is a powerful tool for high resolution chemical separations. Applying CZE to microbial samples may facilitate a deeper understanding of bacterial physiology and behavior. However, the study of complex microbial samples has been limited by the uncontrolled hetero-aggregation of bacterial cells under an applied electric field. We tested a wide range of sample buffers and buffer additives for the optimization of bacterial CZE separations using a 20 mM Tris-HCl background electrolyte. By modifying the sample buffer, but not the background electrolyte, we retain constant separation conditions, which aids in the comparison of the sample buffer additives. We report optimized methods for automated CZE separation and simultaneous fractionation of Escherichia coli B, which is one of the two most widely used wild-type strains. A modified sample buffer containing neutral salts and the addition of glycerol produced a 20-fold increase in loading capacity and a reduction in peak width/broadening of 86% in comparison to previously reported work. In addition, the glycerol-modified sample buffer appears to reduce the persistent aggregation and adhesion to the capillary walls during electrophoretic separations of complex environmental microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.