Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of resting-state fMRI driven machine learning algorithms in the detection of mild cognitive impairment.

Gergo Bolla, Dalida Borbala Berente, Anita Andrássy, Janos Andras Zsuffa, Zoltan Hidasi, Eva Csibri, Gabor Csukly, Anita Kamondi, Mate Kiss, Andras Attila Horvath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gergo BollaNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Dalida Borbala BerenteNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita AndrássyNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Janos Andras ZsuffaNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltan HidasiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eva CsibriDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabor CsuklyNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Anita KamondiNeurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Mate KissSiemens Healthcare, Budapest, Hungary.
Andras Attila HorvathDepartment of Anatomy Histology and Embryology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. horvath.andras1@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.
Semmelweis University · HUSiemens (Hungary) · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a potential therapeutic window in the prevention of dementia; however, automated detection of early cognitive deterioration is an unresolved issue. The aim of our study was to compare various classification approaches to differentiate MCI patients from healthy controls, based on rs-fMRI data, using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Own dataset (from two centers) and ADNI database were used during the analysis. Three fMRI parameters were applied in five feature selection algorithms: local correlation, intrinsic connectivity, and fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations. Support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) methods were applied for classification. We achieved a relatively wide range of 78-87% accuracy for the various feature selection methods with SVM combining the three rs-fMRI parameters. In the ADNI datasets case we can also see even 90% accuracy scores. RF provided a more harmonized result among the feature selection algorithms in both datasets with 80-84% accuracy for our local and 74-82% for the ADNI database. Despite some lower performance metrics of some algorithms, most of the results were positive and could be seen in two unrelated datasets which increase the validity of our methods. Our results highlight the potential of ML-based fMRI applications for automated diagnostic techniques to recognize MCI patients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAlgorithmsBrainHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID38097674
PMCPMC10721802
OpenAlexW4389719675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.