Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38097634›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A citizen science model turns anecdotes into evidence by revealing similar characteristics among Gifted Word Learner dogs.

Shany Dror, Ádám Miklósi, Andrea Sommese, Claudia Fugazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Popperian Dogs-Practical Rationality and Inferential Reasoning in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shany DrorDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s 1c, 6th Floor, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. shanymd@gmail.com.
Ádám MiklósiDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s 1c, 6th Floor, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Andrea SommeseDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s 1c, 6th Floor, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Claudia FugazzaDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s 1c, 6th Floor, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.

Funding

National Brain Research Program NAP 3.0 of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NAP2022-I-‎‎3/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs that have a vocabulary of object labels (Gifted Word Learner dogs-GWL dogs) have great potential as a comparative model for studying a variety of cognitive mechanisms. However, only a handful of studies, with a small sample size of 1 or 2 dogs, have examined this phenomenon. GWL dogs appear to share many of the same distinctive characteristics, but due to their rarity, it is not clear if these similarities are only anecdotal or indeed reflect characteristics that are similar in these rare individuals. Here we present the first study conducted on a relatively large sample of 41 GWL dogs that were recruited and tested using a citizen science model. After testing the dogs' receptive vocabulary of toy names, we asked the owners to complete a questionnaire about their and their dog's life experiences. Our findings highlight several characteristics that are shared among most GWL dogs, such as their learning speed, their large vocabulary, and that they learned the names of the toys spontaneously, without the explicit intent of their owners. Our findings validate previous anecdotal evidence on common characteristics of GWL dogs and supply additional support to the hypothesis that these dogs represent a unique group of dogs.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceHuman-Animal BondAnimalsCognitionDogsLearningVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID38097634
PMCPMC10721640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.