Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38096887›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2024

Inequalities in health system coverage and quality: a cross-sectional survey of four Latin American countries.

Javier Roberti, Hannah H Leslie, Svetlana V Doubova, Jesús Medina Ranilla, Agustina Mazzoni, Laura Espinoza, Renzo Calderón, Catherine Arsenault, Ezequiel García-Elorrio, Patricia J García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Steatotic liver disease in Latin America: current views and perspectives.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javier RobertiInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Epidemiology and Public Health Research Centre, National Council for Scientific and Technical Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: jroberti@iecs.org.ar.
Hannah H LeslieDivision of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jesús Medina RanillaSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Agustina MazzoniInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura EspinozaSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Renzo CalderónSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Catherine ArsenaultDepartment of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Ezequiel García-ElorrioInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia J GarcíaSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The premise of health as a human right in Latin America has been challenged by health system fragmentation, quality gaps, a growing burden of chronic disease, sociopolitical upheaval, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterised inequities in health system quality in Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay. We did a cross-sectional telephone survey with up to 1250 adults in each country. We created binary outcomes in coverage, user experience, system competence, and confidence in the system and calculated the slope index of inequality by income and education. Although access to care was high, only a third of respondents reported having a high-quality source of care and 25% of those with mental health needs had those needs met. Two-thirds of adults were able to access relevant preventive care and 42% of older adults were screened for cardiovascular disease. Telehealth access, communication and autonomy in most recent visit, reasonable waiting times, and receiving preventive health checks showed inequalities favouring people with a high income. In Uruguay, inequality between government and social security services explained a substantial proportion of disparities in preventive health access. In other study countries, inequalities were also substantial within government and social security subsectors. Essential health system functions are unequal in these four Latin American countries.

Indexed as

IncomePandemicsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLatin AmericaMexico

Identifiers

PMID38096887
PMCPMC10716623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.