Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38096207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Archaeological evidence of resource utilisation of the great whales over the past two millennia: A systematic review protocol.

Danielle L Buss, Youri van den Hurk, Mohsen Falahati-Anbaran, Deirdre Elliott, Sally Evans, Brenna A Frasier, Jacqueline A Mulville, Lisa K Rankin, Heidrun Stebergløkken, Peter Whitridge and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Danielle L BussDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-240X
Youri van den HurkDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Trondheim, Norway.
Mohsen Falahati-AnbaranDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Trondheim, Norway.
Deirdre ElliottDepartment of Archaeology, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Sally EvansMSDS Marine and MSDS Heritage, Holbrook, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3708-7771
Brenna A FrasierNova Scotia Museum, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jacqueline A MulvilleSchool of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Lisa K RankinDepartment of Archaeology, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Heidrun StebergløkkenDepartment of Historical and Classical Studies, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Peter WhitridgeDepartment of Archaeology, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2440-3691
James H BarrettDepartment of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU University Museum, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaeological faunal remains provide key insights into human societies in the past, alongside information on previous resource utilisation and exploitation of wildlife populations. The great whales (Mysticete and sperm whales) were hunted unsustainably throughout the 16th - 20th centuries (herein defined as the modern period) leading to large population declines and variable recovery patterns among species. Humans have utilised whales as a resource through carcass scavenging for millennia; however, increasing local and regional ethnographic and archaeological evidence suggests that, prior to the modern period, hunting of the great whales was more common than previously thought; impacts of earlier hunting pressures on the population ecology of many whale species remains relatively unknown. Hunting guided by traditional ecological knowledge may have been sustainable and likely originated in societies that also incorporated opportunistic use of stranded individuals. The collation of georeferenced zooarchaeological data of the great whales between the 1st - 20th centuries CE worldwide will provide insight into the timescale and distribution of resource utilisation of the great whales and how this varied within and between societies, and may have changed over time. By comparing regions of known resource utilisation and breeding and feeding grounds of current-day whale populations, this information will subsequently be used to infer regions where whale populations were possibly lost or extirpated prior to detailed historical records. This systematic review protocol also provides a template for archaeologists, ecologists, and historians interested in using faunal remains to infer historical ecology and resource use of wild animal populations. The transparency of our data collection approach provides opportunities for reproducibility and comparability with future datasets.

Indexed as

Sperm WhaleWhalesAnimalsAnimals, WildData CollectionHumansReproducibility of ResultsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38096207
PMCPMC10721060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.