Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38096104›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

An in silico testbed for fast and accurate MR labeling of orthopedic implants.

Gregory M Noetscher, Peter J Serano, Marc Horner, Alexander Prokop, Jonathan Hanson, Kyoko Fujimoto, James Brown, Ara Nazarian, Jerome Ackerman, Sergey N Makaroff

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Gregory M Noetscher *Electrical & Computer Eng. Dept, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-7206
Peter J Serano *Ansys, Canonsburg, United States.
Marc HornerAnsys, Canonsburg, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-5796
Alexander ProkopDassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
Jonathan HansonNeva Electromagnetics, LLC, Holden, United States.
Kyoko FujimotoGE HealthCare, Chicago, United States.
James BrownMicro Systems Enigineering, Inc, an affiliate of Biotronik, Lake Oswego, United States.
Ara NazarianMusculoskeletal Translational Innovation Initiative, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Jerome AckermanHarvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5176-7496
Sergey N MakaroffElectrical & Computer Eng. Dept, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, United States.
Ansys (United States) · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBiotronik (Switzerland) · CHDassault Systèmes (Germany) · DEGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESHarvard University · US

Funding

Bone Quality Assessment with a Novel Three-Bore Magnet Extremity MRI ScannerR01AR075077 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ACKERMAN, JEROME L · 2020 to 2025
$2.4M
Moving MRI: Imaging a Moving Body with a Moving MRI MagnetR01EB029818 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ACKERMAN, JEROME L · 2020 to 2020
$854k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075077NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029818NIH HHS R01AR075077NIH HHS R01EB029818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One limitation on the ability to monitor health in older adults using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the presence of implants, where the prevalence of implantable devices (orthopedic, cardiac, neuromodulation) increases in the population, as does the pervasiveness of conditions requiring MRI studies for diagnosis (musculoskeletal diseases, infections, or cancer). The present study describes a novel multiphysics implant modeling testbed using the following approaches with two examples: (1) an in silico human model based on the widely available Visible Human Project (VHP) cryo-section dataset; (2) a finite element method (FEM) modeling software workbench from Ansys (Electronics Desktop/Mechanical) to model MR radio frequency (RF) coils and the temperature rise modeling in heterogeneous media. The in silico VHP-Female model (250 parts with an additional 40 components specifically characterizing embedded implants and resultant surrounding tissues) corresponds to a 60-year-old female with a body mass index of 36. The testbed includes the FEM-compatible in silico human model, an implant embedding procedure, a generic parameterizable MRI RF birdcage two-port coil model, a workflow for computing heat sources on the implant surface and in adjacent tissues, and a thermal FEM solver directly linked to the MR coil simulator to determine implant heating based on an MR imaging study protocol. The primary target is MR labeling of large orthopedic implants. The testbed has very recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device development tool for 1.5 T orthopedic implant examinations.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureProstheses and ImplantsAgedComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedTemperaturehumanMR imaging studiesMR safety/labelingmultiphysics modelingorthopedic impantsphysics of living systemstemperature rise

Identifiers

PMID38096104
PMCPMC10721214
OpenAlexW4386770010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.