Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095881›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2024

Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Subgroup Analyses From the KEYNOTE-826 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Krishnansu S Tewari, Nicoletta Colombo, Bradley J Monk, Coraline Dubot, M Valeria Cáceres, Kosei Hasegawa, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Pamela Salman, Eduardo Yañez, Mahmut Gümüs and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03635567 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03635567 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Placebo for the First-Line Treatment of Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer (KEYNOTE-826)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2018 to 2024Enrolled617ConditionsCervical CancerArmsPembrolizumab, Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Clinical efficacy and safety of Cadonilimab immunotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gynecological malignancies: a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Krishnansu S TewariObstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange.
Nicoletta ColomboGynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS and Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Bradley J MonkHonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix.
Coraline DubotOncologie Médicale, Institut Curie Saint Cloud, and GINECO, Paris, France.
M Valeria CáceresMedical Oncology, Instituto de Oncologia Angel H. Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Kosei HasegawaGynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Ronnie Shapira-FrommerElla Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Pamela SalmanMedical Oncology, Oncovida Cancer Center, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo YañezMedical Oncology, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Mahmut GümüsMedical Oncology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mivael Olivera Hurtado de MendozaMedical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru.
Vanessa SamouëlianGynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Vincent CastonguayMedical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Alexander ArkhipovOncology and Chemical Therapy, Medical Rehabilitation Center Under the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Cumhur TekinOncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey.
Kan LiOncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey.
Sarper TokerOncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey.
Stephen M KeefeOncology, Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, New Jersey.
Domenica LorussoGynaecology Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAInstitut Curie · FRInstituto de Oncología de Rosario · ARInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEIstanbul Medeniyet University · TRMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUSaitama Medical University · JPSheba Medical Center · ILUniversidad de La Frontera · CLUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The KEYNOTE-826 randomized clinical trial showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival benefits with the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Treatment effects in patient subgroups of the study population are unknown. Objective: To assess efficacy outcomes in patient subgroups of KEYNOTE-826. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted in a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants included women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix that had not been treated with systemic chemotherapy and was not amenable to curative treatment. This subanalysis was conducted from November 20, 2018, to May 3, 2021. Interventions: Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, every 3 weeks or placebo for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, plus cisplatin, 50 mg/m2, or carboplatin AUC 5 [area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration vs time curve]) with or without bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in subgroups defined by use of bevacizumab (yes or no), choice of platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin), prior chemoradiotherapy (CRT) exposure only (yes or no), and histologic type (squamous or nonsquamous) in patients with programmed cell death ligand 1-positive tumors (defined as a combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and in the intention-to-treat population. Results: A total of 617 patients (median age, 51 years; range, 22-82 years) were enrolled in the trial. In the CPS greater than or equal to 1 population, hazard ratios (HRs) for OS favored the pembrolizumab group in all subgroups: with bevacizumab (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87) and without bevacizumab (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96), use of carboplatin (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.85) and cisplatin (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.04), with prior CRT only (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81) and without prior CRT only (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00), and squamous (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46-0.79) and nonsquamous (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.20) histologic type. In the intention-to-treat population, HRs for OS also favored the pembrolizumab group in all subgroups: with bevacizumab (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.87) and without bevacizumab (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.04), use of carboplatin (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89) or cisplatin (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09), with prior CRT only (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91) and without prior CRT only (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97), and squamous (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) and nonsquamous (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.47-1.23) histologic type. Similar to OS, the addition of pembrolizumab prolonged PFS across all subgroups in the CPS greater than or equal to 1 and intention-to-treat populations. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial suggest that adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved OS across subgroups of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635567.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellLung NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinCisplatinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabCarboplatinCisplatinpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID38095881
PMCPMC10722390
OpenAlexW4389728363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.