Trial reportJAMA oncology2024
Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Subgroup Analyses From the KEYNOTE-826 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03635567 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Placebo for the First-Line Treatment of Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer (KEYNOTE-826)
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of first-line therapies for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a systematic review and exploratory network meta-analysis of immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of combined immune therapy for advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Unlocking the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cervical cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of ICIs for the treatment of advanced CC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Cadonilimab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for advanced cervical cancer: subgroup analyses from the COMPASSION-16 phase 3 trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Using peripheral blood indicators and T cells subsets to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced and recurrent cervical cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Advances in Treatment of Refractory Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Heterogeneity and Differences from Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- STK11 Mutations and Deletions Define an Aggressive Molecular Subgroup of Cervical Adenocarcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy in Gynecologic Cancers: Current Evidence, Biomarker-Driven Practice, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Clinical efficacy and safety of Cadonilimab immunotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gynecological malignancies: a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Bevacizumab and Platinum Choice in Pembrolizumab-Treated Advanced Cervical Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Treatment Advances in Gynecologic Cancers: Insights From Recent Clinical Trials.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy-based control in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- Integrative network pharmacology, molecular dynamics simulation, and single-cell RNA sequencing strategies reveal the multi-target mechanisms of oridonin against cervical cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The KEYNOTE-826 randomized clinical trial showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival benefits with the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Treatment effects in patient subgroups of the study population are unknown. Objective: To assess efficacy outcomes in patient subgroups of KEYNOTE-826. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted in a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants included women with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix that had not been treated with systemic chemotherapy and was not amenable to curative treatment. This subanalysis was conducted from November 20, 2018, to May 3, 2021. Interventions: Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, every 3 weeks or placebo for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, plus cisplatin, 50 mg/m2, or carboplatin AUC 5 [area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration vs time curve]) with or without bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in subgroups defined by use of bevacizumab (yes or no), choice of platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin), prior chemoradiotherapy (CRT) exposure only (yes or no), and histologic type (squamous or nonsquamous) in patients with programmed cell death ligand 1-positive tumors (defined as a combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and in the intention-to-treat population. Results: A total of 617 patients (median age, 51 years; range, 22-82 years) were enrolled in the trial. In the CPS greater than or equal to 1 population, hazard ratios (HRs) for OS favored the pembrolizumab group in all subgroups: with bevacizumab (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87) and without bevacizumab (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96), use of carboplatin (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.85) and cisplatin (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.04), with prior CRT only (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81) and without prior CRT only (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00), and squamous (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46-0.79) and nonsquamous (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.20) histologic type. In the intention-to-treat population, HRs for OS also favored the pembrolizumab group in all subgroups: with bevacizumab (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.87) and without bevacizumab (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.04), use of carboplatin (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89) or cisplatin (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09), with prior CRT only (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91) and without prior CRT only (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97), and squamous (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) and nonsquamous (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.47-1.23) histologic type. Similar to OS, the addition of pembrolizumab prolonged PFS across all subgroups in the CPS greater than or equal to 1 and intention-to-treat populations. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial suggest that adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved OS across subgroups of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635567.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.