Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095822›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2024

Lecanemab: More Questions Than Answers!

Upinder Kaur, Jaideep Reddy, Ashutosh Tiwari, Sasanka Chakrabarti, Sankha Shubhra Chakrabarti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Amyloid-Directed Antibodies: Past, Present, and Future.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Upinder KaurDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jaideep ReddyInstitute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ashutosh TiwariDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Sasanka ChakrabartiDepartment of Biochemistry and Central Research Cell, Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be) University, Mullana, Haryana, India.
Sankha Shubhra ChakrabartiDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India. sankha.chakrabarti1@bhu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-0016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The approval of lecanemab by the US Food and Drug Administration has been touted as a defining moment in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody, is the first Alzheimer's disease drug targeting amyloid beta that has shown statistically significant cognitive benefits in phase III trials. However, there have been many questions raised over the clinical relevance of the otherwise minimal cognitive improvements. Furthermore, its rapid approval has been mired in controversy, in addition to the reports of adverse events such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities and several deaths of participants in the lecanemab trials. Here, we analyze the evidence supporting lecanemab as an amyloid beta therapy and also discuss the concerns raised about its efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug Delivery SystemsHumansUnited StatesAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedlecanemab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.