ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2023
Machine Learning in Invasive and Noninvasive Coronary Angiography.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional Chinese and Western medicine-integrated risk prediction models for coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Themes.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Multimodal deep learning for cardiovascular disease detection using pulse wave and vocal signals: a prediction model development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Application of low-dose "one-stop" myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Predicting symptomatic carotid artery plaques with radiomics-based carotid perivascular adipose tissue characteristics: a multicenter, multiclassifier study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe objective of this review is to shed light on the transformative potential of machine learning (ML) in coronary angiography. We aim to understand existing developments in using ML for coronary angiography and discuss broader implications for the future of coronary angiography and cardiovascular medicine. RECENT
findingsThe developments in invasive and noninvasive imaging have revolutionized diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CAD remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. ML has emerged as a powerful tool to further improve image analysis, hemodynamic assessment, lesion detection, and predictive modeling. These advancements have enabled more accurate identification of CAD, streamlined workflows, reduced the need for invasive diagnostic procedures, and improved the diagnostic value of invasive procedures when they are needed. Further integration of ML with coronary angiography will advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CAD. The integration of ML with coronary angiography is ushering in a new era in cardiovascular medicine. We highlight five use cases to leverage ML in coronary angiography: (1) improvement of quality and efficacy, (2) characterization of plaque, (3) hemodynamic assessment, (4) prediction of future outcomes, and (5) diagnosis of non-atherosclerotic coronary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.