Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095779›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Atypical EGFR Mutations.

Leah Wells, Angel Qin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Current status of molecular diagnostics for lung cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leah WellsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5848, Med Inn C349, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Angel QinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5848, Med Inn C349, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA. qina@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-3087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) should always be considered when treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atypical EGFR mutations. The first choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation(s) present and its effect on structure and function of the EGFR protein. Afatinib is the only EGFR TKI currently FDA approved for atypical EGFR mutations and has the strongest data to support its use in PACC mutations, a subgroup of atypical EGFR mutations which includes G719X and S7681. Dacomitinib may also be an option for these mutations given similar efficacy to afatinib. In contrast, for classical-like mutations such as L861Q, osimertinib should be considered the first choice given that their behavior mimics that of the classical mutations exon 19 deletion and L858R. Osimertinib should also be utilized in the setting of a concurrent T790M mutation. Superior CNS penetrance and well managed toxicity profile may also be reasons to consider osimertinib. Given that the choice of TKI may depend on the specific mutation, it is crucial that every patient diagnosed with NSCLC undergo comprehensive sequencing to identify these mutations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAfatinibAniline CompoundsErbB ReceptorsHumansIndolesMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesAcrylamidesAfatinibAniline CompoundsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIndolesosimertinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesAtypical EGFRNSCLCTyrosine kinase inhibitorUncommon EGFR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.