Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095746›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2023

Virtual reality simulation training improve diagnostic knee arthroscopy and meniscectomy skills: a prospective transfer validity study.

Alexandre Tronchot, Tiphaine Casy, Nicolas Vallee, Harold Common, Hervé Thomazeau, Pierre Jannin, Arnaud Huaulmé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Game-based learning in orthopaedics: A comprehensive review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Automated assessment of non-technical skills by heart-rate data.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre TronchotUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France. Alexandre.TRONCHOT@etudiant.univ-rennes1.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-3282
Tiphaine CasyUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Nicolas ValleeUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Harold CommonOrthopaedics and Trauma Department, Rennes University Hospital, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Hervé ThomazeauUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Pierre JanninUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Arnaud HuaulméUniversity Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, Equipe MediCIS- UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited data exist on the actual transfer of skills learned using a virtual reality (VR) simulator for arthroscopy training because studies mainly focused on VR performance improvement and not on transfer to real word (transfer validity). The purpose of this single-blinded, controlled trial was to objectively investigate transfer validity in the context of initial knee arthroscopy training.

methodsFor this study, 36 junior resident orthopaedic surgeons (postgraduate year one and year two) without prior experience in arthroscopic surgery were enrolled to receive standard knee arthroscopy surgery training (NON-VR group) or standard training plus training on a hybrid virtual reality knee arthroscopy simulator (1 h/month) (VR group). At inclusion, all participants completed a questionnaire on their current arthroscopic technical skills. After 6 months of training, both groups performed three exercises that were evaluated independently by two blinded trainers: i) arthroscopic partial meniscectomy on a bench-top knee simulator; ii) supervised diagnostic knee arthroscopy on a cadaveric knee; and iii) supervised knee partial meniscectomy on a cadaveric knee. Training level was determined with the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) score.

resultsOverall, performance (ASSET scores) was better in the VR group than NON-VR group (difference in the global scores: p < 0.001, in bench-top meniscectomy scores: p = 0.03, in diagnostic knee arthroscopy on a cadaveric knee scores: p = 0.04, and in partial meniscectomy on a cadaveric knee scores: p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis by postgraduate year showed that the year-one NON-VR subgroup performed worse than the other subgroups, regardless of the exercise.

conclusionThis study showed the transferability of the technical skills acquired by novice residents on a hybrid virtual reality simulator to the bench-top and cadaveric models. Surgical skill acquired with a VR arthroscopy surgical simulator might safely improve arthroscopy competences in the operating room, also helping to standardise resident training and follow their progress. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2:

Indexed as

Arthroscopy simulatorSurgical trainingTransfer validityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38095746
PMCPMC10721743
OpenAlexW4389740723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.