Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095683›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Imaging in children and adolescents with urinary tract infections].

J D Moritz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D MoritzKlinik für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Kinderradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Straße 3, Haus C, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. JoergDetlev.Moritz@uksh.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological problemUrinary tract infections are among the most common infectious diseases in childhood. The task of imaging is to detect predisposing factors, such as urinary transport disorders, vesicoureteral reflux, as well as complications such as abscesses or pyonephrosis in addition to possible morphological changes of the kidneys and the draining urinary tract during an infection. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: The initial diagnostic imaging technique is generally sonography. For the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux, voiding urosonography or alternatively radiological voiding cystourethrography are used. Further diagnostic workup may include scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or, in exceptional cases, computed tomography (CT). RECOMMENDATION FOR PRACTICE: In children and adolescents, it is of particular importance to avoid recurrent urinary tract infections and their sequelae. This requires precise imaging diagnostics, which must be performed with special consideration of radiation protection.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsVesico-Ureteral RefluxAdolescentChildHumansKidneyRadiographyUrinationBacterial infectionsPyelonephritisUltrasonographyVesicoureteral refluxVoiding cystourethrogram

Identifiers

PMID38095683
OpenAlexW4389738420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.