ArticleArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2024
Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Diverse Populations Using Machine Learning and Structured Electronic Health Records.
Article in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for venous thromboembolism risk stratification in surgical patients: a systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- All of Us diversity and scale yield context-dependent improvements in polygenic prediction.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence into venous thromboembolism care: Predictive models, implementation challenges, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Venous Thromboembolism Prevention: A Narrative Review of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Natural Language Processing.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit: Multicenter Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for Hospitalized patients with deep vein thrombosis.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Explainable machine-learning model for postoperative lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis after gynecologic cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Deep Vein Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients with COPD: Development and Multicenter External Validation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Derivation of a novel risk assessment model of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Anticoagulants: Precision Strategies for Patient-Centered Thromboprophylaxis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting venous thromboembolism complications following colorectal cancer surgery.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
- Genetic analyses of eight complex diseases using predicted continuous representations of disease.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Leveraging the All of Us research program to advance heart, lung, blood, and sleep research.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- All of Us diversity and scale improve polygenic prediction contextually with greatest improvements for under-represented populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep vein thrombosis in severe community-acquired pneumonia patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcome.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for postoperative stent occlusion in patients undergoing iliac vein stenting based on an explainable machine learning model.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Genetic factors, risk prediction and AI application of thrombotic diseases.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Predictive modeling of lower extreme deep vein thrombosis following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: based on multiple machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Nomogram for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism among patients with cardiovascular diseases.Thrombosis journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current risk assessment tools, such as the Caprini and Padua scores and Wells criteria, have limitations in their applicability and accuracy. This study aimed to develop machine learning models using structured electronic health record data to predict diagnosis and 1-year risk of VTE.
methodsWe trained and validated models on data from 159 001 participants in the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse. We then externally tested them on 401 723 participants in the UK Biobank and 123 039 participants in All of Us. All data sets contain populations of diverse ancestries and clinical histories. We used these data sets to develop small, medium, and large models with increasing features on a range of optimizing portability to maximizing performance. We make trained models publicly available in click-and-run format at https://doi.org/10.17632/tkwzysr4y6.6.
resultsIn the holdout and external test sets, respectively, models achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 to 0.83 and 0.72 to 0.82 for VTE diagnosis prediction and 0.76 to 0.78 and 0.64 to 0.69 for 1-year risk prediction, significantly outperforming the Padua score. Models also demonstrated robust performance across different VTE types and patient subsets, including ethnicity, age, and surgical and hospitalization status. Models identified both established and novel clinical features contributing to VTE risk, offering valuable insights into its underlying pathophysiology.
conclusionsMachine learning models using structured electronic health record data can significantly improve VTE diagnosis and 1-year risk prediction in diverse populations. Model probability scores exist on a continuum, affecting mortality risk in both healthy individuals and VTE cases. Integrating these models into electronic health record systems to generate real-time predictions may enhance VTE risk assessment, early detection, and preventative measures, ultimately reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.