Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38095106›Full record

ArticleArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2024

Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Diverse Populations Using Machine Learning and Structured Electronic Health Records.

Robert Chen, Ben Omega Petrazzini, Waqas A Malick, Robert S Rosenson, Ron Do

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert ChenCharles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine (R.C., B.O.P., R.D.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-8342
Ben Omega PetrazziniCharles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine (R.C., B.O.P., R.D.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9789-9371
Waqas A MalickThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute (W.A.M., R.S.R.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Robert S RosensonThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute (W.A.M., R.S.R.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5599-0633
Ron DoCharles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine (R.C., B.O.P., R.D.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3144-3627

Funding

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007280 · NIGMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI BARON, MARGARET H · 1985 to 2021
$22.8M
Mount Sinai Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM146636 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Talia H Swartz · 2022 to 2026
$6.8M
Towards an integrated map of causal connections for common, complex diseasesR35GM124836 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Ron Do · 2017 to 2026
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124836NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007280NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM146636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current risk assessment tools, such as the Caprini and Padua scores and Wells criteria, have limitations in their applicability and accuracy. This study aimed to develop machine learning models using structured electronic health record data to predict diagnosis and 1-year risk of VTE.

methodsWe trained and validated models on data from 159 001 participants in the Mount Sinai Data Warehouse. We then externally tested them on 401 723 participants in the UK Biobank and 123 039 participants in All of Us. All data sets contain populations of diverse ancestries and clinical histories. We used these data sets to develop small, medium, and large models with increasing features on a range of optimizing portability to maximizing performance. We make trained models publicly available in click-and-run format at https://doi.org/10.17632/tkwzysr4y6.6.

resultsIn the holdout and external test sets, respectively, models achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 to 0.83 and 0.72 to 0.82 for VTE diagnosis prediction and 0.76 to 0.78 and 0.64 to 0.69 for 1-year risk prediction, significantly outperforming the Padua score. Models also demonstrated robust performance across different VTE types and patient subsets, including ethnicity, age, and surgical and hospitalization status. Models identified both established and novel clinical features contributing to VTE risk, offering valuable insights into its underlying pathophysiology.

conclusionsMachine learning models using structured electronic health record data can significantly improve VTE diagnosis and 1-year risk prediction in diverse populations. Model probability scores exist on a continuum, affecting mortality risk in both healthy individuals and VTE cases. Integrating these models into electronic health record systems to generate real-time predictions may enhance VTE risk assessment, early detection, and preventative measures, ultimately reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with VTE.

Indexed as

Population HealthVenous ThromboembolismElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsmachine learningmedical recordsmorbidityrisk assessmentthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID38095106
PMCPMC10872966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.