ArticleACS ES&T water2023
Performance of Community Water Board-Managed Passive In-Line Chlorinators Supported by a Circuit Rider Program in Rural Honduras.
Article in ACS ES&T water, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Sustainability of Water Chlorination in Public Healthcare Services in Guatemala.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the ability of passive chlorinators and the associated kinds of external support necessary to provide adequate free chlorine residual (FCR) for community distribution systems in rural Honduras. We found that 77% of samples, from distribution systems with passive chlorinators installed by EOS International at storage tanks within these distribution systems, had FCR concentrations that met or exceeded the World Health Organization minimum threshold of 0.2 mg/L for point-of-use or piped systems. In EOS-supported communities, passive chlorinators delivered FCR ≥ 0.2 mg/L in 90% of tank samples, 83% of middle-house samples, and 79% of last-house samples. Technical issues accounted for only 26% of all lapses in chlorination (i.e., FCR = 0 mg/L). Occasional and habitual errors of the local water board accounted for 24 and 15% of all lapses. Visit frequency by EOS circuit riders was strongly correlated with positive chlorination outcomes, and technical assistance visits were the most valuable of all visit types. It was also shown that monitoring visits were negatively correlated with other visit types, indicating that monitoring may take place at the expense of more valuable visit types, which highlights the potential need for remote FCR monitoring approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.