ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023
Reliability and Validity of the Amharic Version of the Hill-Bone Adherence to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale Among Ethiopian Hypertensive Patients.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Antihypertensive Drug Adherence and Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is the leading cause of death from cardiovascular disease. Non-adherence to treatment and lifestyle modification are the key drivers of suboptimal blood pressure control and cardiovascular events. Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Amharic version of the Hill-Bone Adherence to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale (HBTS) among Ethiopian hypertensive patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 294 hypertensive patients at two health facilities from 1 Results: Cronbach of the 14-item HBTS was initially 0.801. After excluding one item from the appointment-keeping subscale, Cronbach of the modified 13-item HBTS was 0.806. The initial principal component analysis revealed four constructs for the 14-item and three for the 12-item with a total explained variance of 58.65% and 55.73%, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis failed to fit the observed items with the latent subscales. The predictive validity test showed that the modified 12-item Amharic version was correlated (r= 0.118;p<0.043) with systolic blood pressure. Conclusion: The modified 13-item Amharic version of the HBTS is a reliable and valid tool with adequate psychometric properties. It can be used to assess adherence to antihypertensive medications in Amharic-speaking patients in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.