ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023
Clinical screening of Nocardia in sputum smears based on neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on clinical challenges and prevention strategies of drug-resistantFrontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Nocardia is clinically rare but highly pathogenic in clinical practice. Due to the lack of Nocardia screening methods, Nocardia is often missed in diagnosis, leading to worsening the condition. Therefore, this paper proposes a Nocardia screening method based on neural networks, aiming at quick Nocardia detection in sputum specimens with low costs and thereby reducing the missed diagnosis rate. Methods: Firstly, sputum specimens were collected from patients who were infected with Nocardia, and a part of the specimens were mixed with new sputum specimens from patients without Nocardia infection to enhance the data diversity. Secondly, the specimens were converted into smears with Gram staining. Images were captured under a microscope and subsequently annotated by experts, creating two datasets. Thirdly, each dataset was divided into three subsets: the training set, the validation set and the test set. The training and validation sets were used for training networks, while the test set was used for evaluating the effeteness of the trained networks. Finally, a neural network model was trained on this dataset, with an image of Gram-stained sputum smear as input, this model determines the presence and locations of Nocardia instances within the image. Results: After training, the detection network was evaluated on two datasets, resulting in classification accuracies of 97.3% and 98.3%, respectively. This network can identify Nocardia instances in about 24 milliseconds per image on a personal computer. The detection metrics of mAP50 on both datasets were 0.780 and 0.841, respectively. Conclusion: The Nocardia screening method can accurately and efficiently determine whether Nocardia exists in the images of Gram-stained sputum smears. Additionally, it can precisely locate the Nocardia instances, assisting doctors in confirming the presence of Nocardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.