Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094713›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023

Association between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of, 11 routes of medicine administration: A survey in 21 countries and regions.

Sudaxshina Murdan, Li Wei, Diana A van Riet-Nales, Abyot Endale Gurmu, Stella Folajole Usifoh, Adriana-Elena Tăerel, Ayca Yıldız-Peköz, Dušanka Krajnović, Lilian M Azzopardi, Tina Brock and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 19 institutions in 18 countries.

Sudaxshina MurdanUCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
Li WeiUCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
Diana A van Riet-NalesMedicines Evaluation Board Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abyot Endale GurmuDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Stella Folajole UsifohDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
Adriana-Elena TăerelFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Ayca Yıldız-PeközDept. of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul University, Turkey.
Dušanka KrajnovićDepartment of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Lilian M AzzopardiDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Tina BrockDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF School of Pharmacy, UCSF Box 0622, 521 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco 94143, USA.
Ana I FernandesEgas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal.
André Luis Souza Dos SantosDepartment of General Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Berko Panyin AntoDept of Clinical & Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.
Thibault ValletClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France.
Eunkyung Euni LeeSeoul National University College of Pharmacy, Republic of Korea.
Kyeong Hye JeongCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea.
Marwan AkelSchool of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Lebanon.
Eliza TamDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Daisy VolmerInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
Tawfik DoussFaculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Tunisia.
Sharvari ShuklaSymbiosis Statistical Institute, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Shigeo YamamuraDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai International University, Togane, Chiba, Japan.
Xiaoe LouZhejiang University, China.
Bauke H G van RietDepartment of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute (at the time of participant recruitment in the Netherlands: MEB and VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cyril O UsifohDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
Mahama DuwiejuaDept of Clinical & Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.
Fabrice RuizClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France.
Adrian FurnhamDept Leadership and Orgnaisational Behaviour, Norwegian Business School, Norway.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHMedicines Evaluation Board · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Benin · NGChung-Ang University · KREscola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz · PTIstanbul University · TRLebanese International University · LBSeoul National University · KRSymbiosis International University · INUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Gondar · ETUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Monastir · TNUniversity of Tartu · EEZhejiang University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council G106/1249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicines can be taken by various routes of administration. These can impact the effects and perceptions of medicines. The literature about individuals' preferences for and perceptions of the different routes of administration is sparse, but indicates a potential influence of culture. Our aim was to determine: (i) any association between one's culture and one's preferred route of medicine administration and (ii) individual perceptions of pain, efficacy, speed of action and acceptability when medicines are swallowed or placed in the mouth, under the tongue, in the nose, eye, ear, lungs, rectum, vagina, on the skin, or areinjected. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey of adults was conducted in 21 countries and regions of the world, namely, Tunisia, Ghana, Nigeria, Turkey, Ethiopia, Lebanon, Malta, Brazil, Great Britain, United States, India, Serbia, Romania, Portugal, France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, mainland China and Estonia, using the Inglehart-Welzel cultural map to ensure coverage across all cultures. Participants scored the pain/discomfort, efficacy, speed of onset and acceptability of the different routes of medicine administration and stated their preferred route. Demographic information was collected. A total of 4435 participants took part in the survey. Overall, the oral route was the most preferred route, followed by injection, while the rectal route was the least preferred. While the oral route was the most preferred in all cultures, the percentage of participants selecting this route varied, from 98% in Protestant Europe to 50% in the African-Islamic culture. A multinomial logistic regression model revealed a number of predictors for the preferred route. Injections were favoured in the Baltic, South Asia, Latin America and African-Islamic cultures while dermal administration was favoured in Catholic Europe, Baltic and Latin America cultures. A marked association was found between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of the different routes by which medicines are taken. This applied to even the least favoured routes (vaginal and rectal). Only women were asked about the vaginal route, and our data shows that the vaginal route was slightly more popular than the rectal one.

Indexed as

AssociationCultureMedicinePerceptionPreferenceRoute of administration

Identifiers

PMID38094713
PMCPMC10716026
OpenAlexW4389009939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.