Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094660›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Laryngeal mask use during neonatal resuscitation at birth: A United States-based survey of neonatal resuscitation program providers and instructors.

Elizabeth E Foglia, Birju A Shah, Lise DeShea, Kathryn Lander, Beena D Kamath-Rayne, Heidi M Herrick, Jeanette Zaichkin, Sura Lee, Christopher Bonafide, Clara Song and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neonatal Airway Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth E FogliaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Birju A ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Lise DeSheaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Kathryn LanderGlobal Child Health and Life Support, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, United States.
Beena D Kamath-RayneGlobal Child Health and Life Support, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, United States.
Heidi M HerrickDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jeanette ZaichkinPositive Pressure, PLLC, Shelton, WA, United States.
Sura LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Christopher BonafideDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Clara SongSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Anaheim, CA, United States.
Gene HallfordDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Henry C LeeDivision of Neonatology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Vishal KapadiaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States.
Tina LeoneDivision of Neonatology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
Justin JosephsenDivision of Neonatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Arun GuptaDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Marya L StrandDivision of Neonatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
William H BeasleyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Edgardo SzyldDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
American Academy of Pediatrics Delivery Room Intervention, Evaluation DRIVE Network
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USAmerican Academy of Pediatrics · USSaint Louis University · USColumbia University · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Leveraging Human Factors to Evaluate Quality of Neonatal Delivery Room CareK08HS029029 · AHRQ · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Heidi Herrick · 2022 to 2026
$713k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS029029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Neonatal resuscitation guidelines promote the laryngeal mask (LM) interface for positive pressure ventilation (PPV), but little is known about how the LM is used among Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) Providers and Instructors. The study aim was to characterize the training, experience, confidence, and perspectives of NRP Providers and Instructors regarding LM use during neonatal resuscitation at birth. Methods: A voluntary anonymous survey was emailed to all NRP Providers and Instructors. Survey items addressed training, experience, confidence, and barriers for LM use during resuscitation. Associations between respondent characteristics and outcomes of both LM experience and confidence were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Between 11/7/22-12/12/22, there were 5,809 survey respondents: 68% were NRP Providers, 55% were nurses, and 87% worked in a hospital setting. Of these, 12% had ever placed a LM during newborn resuscitation, and 25% felt very or completely confident using a LM. In logistic regression, clinical or simulated hands-on training, NRP Instructor role, professional role, and practice setting were all associated with both LM experience and confidence.The three most frequently identified barriers to LM use were insufficient experience (46%), preference for other interfaces (25%), and failure to consider the LM during resuscitation (21%). One-third (33%) reported that LMs are not available where they resuscitate newborns. Conclusion: Few NRP providers and instructors use the LM during neonatal resuscitation. Strategies to increase LM use include hands-on clinical training, outreach promoting the advantages of the LM compared to other interfaces, and improving availability of the LM in delivery settings.

Indexed as

Laryngeal Mask, SurveyNewbornResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID38094660
PMCPMC10716019
OpenAlexW4389162245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.