Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094563›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Role of Primary Healthcare Physicians in Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed Alessa, Fatema M Alhelal, Abdulelah A Al Ahmed, Abdullah A AlKhars, Ridha K Alomran, Mohammed M Albaqshi, Norah I Alabdullatif, Ziyad Alamer, Ali H Buzaid, Hussain Abbas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed AlessaGeneral Surgery, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Fatema M AlhelalCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Abdulelah A Al AhmedCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Abdullah A AlKharsCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Ridha K AlomranGeneral Surgery, King Fahad General Hospital, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Mohammed M AlbaqshiCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Norah I AlabdullatifCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Ziyad AlamerCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Ali H BuzaidCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Hussain AbbasGeneral Surgery, King Fahad Hospital, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
King Fahad Hospital Hufūf · SAKing Faisal University · SAKing Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Saudi Arabia. Late stages of the disease are associated with increased mortality rates, and early detection is known to improve the disease course and significantly reduce the mortality rate. Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding CRC screening guidelines influence the successful implementation of screening programs. Understanding them is key to developing targeted interventions to enhance screening rates and promote early detection.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional assessment of the current practice and knowledge of CRC screening among healthcare practitioners in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, by using a questionnaire. This questionnaire had seven multiple-choice questions to assess knowledge and six multiple-choice questions to assess physicians' attitudes toward CRC screening.  Results: The mean age of participants was 33 years; 60.8% (n=113) were men and 39.2% (n=73) were women. The majority were Saudi nationals (n=169; 90.9%). Self-assessed knowledge levels varied: 42.5% considered their knowledge of CRC screening adequate, 27.4% indicated that it was poor, and 30.1% reported that it was satisfactory. Positive attitudes towards CRC screening were expressed by 83.9% of participants. Also, physicians' attitude scores varied by demographic factors. Significant correlations were found between attitude scores and marital status, medical qualification, and job title. There was no significant correlation between gender, nationality, and years of experience. The majority (75.3%) agreed that colonoscopy is the best available screening test, but highlighted issues with accessibility and actual availability.

conclusionFindings from this study provide insights into physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CRC screening. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective interventions to enhance CRC screening rates and overall public health. Further education and standardized guidelines are recommended to address the variations observed in the study population.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerearly detection of cancerprimary health care centersprimary healthcare physicianscreening guidelines

Identifiers

PMID38094563
PMCPMC10718169
OpenAlexW4388636101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.