ArticleCureus2023
Repercussions of Denosumab in Patients With Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe advent of denosumab has rendered giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone amenable. It makes sense to evaluate its effect on the patient's symptoms and the histopathological outcomes. The aim of the study is to ascertain the effect of 24-week neoadjuvant denosumab therapy on the following parameters: visual analogue scale (VAS), musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scores, tumor size, and the number of giant and stromal cells. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis observational study was conducted from February 2022 to April 2023 at SCB Medical College and Hospital, India. Fifty-four GCT participants had their VAS and MSTS scores assessed at baseline and then every four weeks for the next 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, changes in their tumor size and the number of giant and stromal cells per high-power field (hpf) were also evaluated.
resultsFifty-four (82%) out of the 66 enrolled participants completed the study. Among those 54, 29 (54%) participants were female. The study population had a mean age of 39.0 ± 4.7 years. The median VAS scores were (female: 7.0, male: 7.0; p = 0.51) at baseline and (female: 2.0, male: 2.0; p = 0.39) at 24 weeks. The median MSTS scores at baseline and 24 weeks were (female: 8.0, male: 8.0; p = 0.41) and (female: 15.0, male: 16.0; p = 0.66), respectively. The median reductions in tumor size, the number of giant, and stromal cells (per hpf) were (female: 6.0 mm, male: 5.0 mm; p = 0.11), (female: 25, male: 27; p = 0.07), and (female: 1200, male: 2100; p < 0.001), respectively.
conclusionAfter receiving neoadjuvant denosumab for 24 weeks, the study participants' clinical symptoms and histological indicators improved. With the exception of the stromal cells, there was no statistically significant difference between the male and female participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.