Erratum: Development of a gene edited next-generation hematopoietic cell transplant to enable acute myeloid leukemia treatment by solving off-tumor toxicity.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. CRISPR/Cas9-based nanodelivery systems for precision gene editing in neuroinflammation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
   Review
2. Engraftment Outcome of CRISPR/Cas9-Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Genetic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Evidence.Journal of hematology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Development of a gene edited next-generation hematopoietic cell transplant to enable acute myeloid leukemia treatment by solving off-tumor toxicity.2023

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract