Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Enhancing decellularized vascular scaffolds with PVDF and PCL reinforcement: a fused deposition modeling approach.

Kirill Yu Klyshnikov, Maria A Rezvova, Nikita V Belikov, Tatiana V Glushkova, Evgeny A Ovcharenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirill Yu KlyshnikovDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Laboratory of Novel Biomaterials, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Maria A RezvovaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Laboratory of Novel Biomaterials, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Nikita V BelikovDepartment of Biomedical Technical Systems, Laboratory of Medical Robotics and Biomaterials, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana V GlushkovaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Laboratory of Novel Biomaterials, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.
Evgeny A OvcharenkoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Laboratory of Novel Biomaterials, Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Decellularized xenogenic scaffolds represent a promising substrate for tissue-engineered vascular prostheses, particularly those with smaller diameters (<6 mm). Despite their benefits, a notable limitation presents itself during decellularization, namely, the diminished mechanical strength that introduces the risk of aneurysmal dilations in the early post-implantation period. This study introduces a strategy for modification the mechanical properties of these biological scaffolds through the forming of an external polymeric reinforcement via thermal extrusion. Methods: The study utilized scaffolds fabricated from bovine internal mammary arteries through decellularization and preservation. The scaffolds were divided into subgroups and reinforced with polymeric helices made of Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and Polycaprolactone (PCL), Results: Using a double-layer helix for the reinforcement significantly enhanced the radial tensile strength of the scaffolds, increasing it up to 2.26 times. Yet, the comparison of vessel's compliance between two reinforced and the Control scaffolds within the physiological pressures range did not reveal any significant differences. Numerical simulation of aneurysm growth showed that thin-walled regions of the Control scaffold developed aneurysmal-type protrusions, bulging up to 0.7 mm, with a substantial degradation of mechanical properties. In contrast, both PVDF and PCL reinforced scaffolds did not exhibit significant property degradation, with deformations ranging 0.1-0.13 mm depending on the model, and a maximum decrease in the modulus of elasticity of 23%. Conclusion: The results of the study demonstrated that the external polymer helical reinforcement of decellularized scaffolds via thermal extrusion enables a controlled modification of mechanical properties, notably enhancing radial strength while maintaining sufficient compliance within the physiological pressure range. A series of

Indexed as

biocompatible polymersdecellularized xenogenic scaffoldsexternal reinforcementPCLPVDFthermal extrusionvascular scaffold

Identifiers

PMID38094125
PMCPMC10716200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.