Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094092›Full record

ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2023

APAAACI clinical pathway on direct provocation testing for penicillin allergy delabeling.

Philip Hei Li, Bernard Yu-Hor Thong, Ruby Pawankar, Chandima Jeewandara, Rommel Crisenio M Lobo, Hye-Ryun Kang, Padukudru Anand Mahesh, Juan Meng, Sonomjamts Munkhbayarlakh, Duy Le Pham and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality and Consistency of Penicillin Allergy Delabelling Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Direct Oral Challenge for Penicillin Allergy: The International Network of Antibiotic Allergy Nations (iNAAN) Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bridging Global Disparities in Drug Allergy Through AI-Assisted Training for Non-Specialists: Findings From the Multinational ADAPT-2 Course.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in China: Advancing Awareness, Access, Advocacy and Alliances From the Greater Bay Area to the Global HAE Community.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  11. Penicillin Allergy in China: Consequences of Inappropriate Skin Testing Practices and Policies.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bibliometric analysis of the trends and evolution in β-lactam allergy research.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 15 countries.

Philip Hei LiDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Bernard Yu-Hor ThongDepartment of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Ruby PawankarDepartment of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Chandima JeewandaraAllergy Immunology and Cell Biology Unit, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.
Rommel Crisenio M LoboFe del Mundo Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Hye-Ryun KangDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine/Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea.
Padukudru Anand MaheshDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSSAHER, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Juan MengAllergy Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
Sonomjamts MunkhbayarlakhDepartment of Pulmonology & Allergology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Mongolia.
Duy Le PhamFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ticha RerkpattanapipatAllergy Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.
Min-Moon TangDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Masao YamaguchiDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Amir Hamzah Abdul LatiffAllergy & Immunology Centre Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Iris RengganisDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Jiu-Yao WangAllergy, Immunology, and Microbiome (A.I.M.) Research Centre, China Medical University Children's Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Luo ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Michaela LucasDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Hospital Kuala Lumpur · MYBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNChina Medical University · TWEast Avenue Medical Center · PHJSS Medical College and Hospital · INMahidol University · THMongolian National University of Medical Sciences · MNNippon Medical School · JPSeoul National University Hospital · KRSichuan University · CNTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGTeikyo University Chiba Medical Center · JPThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VNUniversity of Sri Jayewardenepura · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Allergy to penicillin is commonly reported in many countries and is an overwhelming global public health concern. Penicillin allergy labels can lead to the use of less effective antibiotics and can be associated with antimicrobial resistance. Appropriate assessment of suspected penicillin allergy (often including skin testing, followed by drug provocation testing [DPT] performed by allergists) can prevent the unnecessary restriction of penicillin or delabelling. Many countries in the Asia Pacific (AP) have very limited access to allergy services, and there are significant disparities in the methods of evaluating penicillin allergy. Therefore, a clinical pathway for the management of penicillin allergy is essential. Objectives: To develop a risk-stratified clinical pathway for delabeling penicillin allergy, taking into account the distinct epidemiology, patient/sensitization profiles, and disparities of allergy services or facilities within the AP. Methods: A risk-stratified penicillin allergy delabeling clinical pathway was formulated by the Drug Allergy Committee of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. and members of the Penicillin Allergy Disparities survey in AP each representing one country/region of the AP. The clinical pathway was tested based on a database of anonymized patients who were sequentially referred for and completed penicillin allergy evaluation in Hong Kong. Results: The clinical pathway was piloted employing a "hub-and-spoke" approach to foster multidisciplinary collaboration between allergists and nonallergists. A simulation run of the algorithm on a retrospective Hong Kong cohort of 439 patients was performed. Overall, 367 (84%) of patients were suitable for direct DPT and reduced the need for skin testing or specialist's care for 357 (97%) skin test-negative individuals. Out of the skin test-negative patients, 345 (94%) patients had a negative DPT. Conclusions: This risk-stratification strategy for direct oral DPT can reduce the need for unnecessary skin testing in patients with low-risk penicillin allergy histories. The hub and spoke model of care may be considered for further piloting and validation in other AP populations that lack adequately trained allergists.

Indexed as

Allergydelabelingpenicillinstewardship

Identifiers

PMID38094092
PMCPMC10715740
OpenAlexW4389802534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.