Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094077›Full record

ArticleThe Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference : I/ITSEC. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference2023

Using Non-immersive VR Simulations in Conjunction with Priming to Enhance Conceptualizing Radiation and Risk.

Angela Leek, Nir Keren, Andrew Lawson, Aidan Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference : I/ITSEC. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela LeekIowa State University Ames, IA.
Nir KerenIowa State University Ames, IA.
Andrew LawsonIowa State University Ames, IA.
Aidan WebsterIowa State University Ames, IA.

Funding

The Heartland Center for Occupational Health and Safety Education and Research CenterT42OH008491 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI O'SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK T · 2005 to 2025
$31.7M
ACL HHS T42OH008491NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation is present daily and used throughout many industries for beneficial purposes. Safety professionals and workers need a general understanding of radiation identification techniques and associated risks to manage the work environment with radiation protection practices. This is especially important in workplaces where the radiation source is ancillary to the primary activities of the industry. The elusive nature of radiation makes learners understanding in an educational setting a challenge. Furthermore, delivering a hands-on experience to support learning and training of radiation, its assessment, and protection measures is quite difficult, given its hazardous nature. Virtual reality, even using non-immersive environments, offers significant benefits through simulating sources of radiation. A non-immersive simulator titled AssessRadVR, facilitated the radiation experience and presented dynamically the effects of the trainees' interactions with shielding materials, detection equipment, and the working environment. Yet, interaction with simulation alone may not trigger effective encoding of these critical aspects in long-term memory. This paper discusses using the AssessRadVR simulator in conjunction with a procedure for subliminally priming the long-term memory encoding to enhance radiation's activated representation. Students in an introductory industrial hygiene class were divided into two groups and primed with either alarming or non-alarming words following the Bargh, Chen, & Borrows procedure (1996). Results demonstrated that students primed with alarming words were more open to objectively evaluating the radiation sources due to their overall perception that the risk was manageable. Why is this of interest to the community: The results provided that even with limited prior knowledge in radiation, after engaging with the simulator, most students were able to recognize and apply radiation principles, which indicates they could apply key principles in a real-world radiation workplace. Further, the impact of activating with alarming words led to a statistically significantly higher perception that working in the radiation environment was manageable.

Identifiers

PMID38094077
PMCPMC10716861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.