Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38094001›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

A tale of two targets: examining the differential effects of posterior cingulate cortex- and amygdala-targeted fMRI-neurofeedback in a PTSD pilot study.

Jonathan M Lieberman, Daniela Rabellino, Maria Densmore, Paul A Frewen, David Steyrl, Frank Scharnowski, Jean Théberge, Niki Hosseini-Kamkar, Richard W J Neufeld, Rakesh Jetly and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reflecting onJournal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
  10. Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonathan M LiebermanAtlas Institute for Veterans and Families, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Daniela RabellinoImaging, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Maria DensmoreImaging, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Paul A FrewenDepartment of Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
David SteyrlDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Frank ScharnowskiDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jean ThébergeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Niki Hosseini-KamkarAtlas Institute for Veterans and Families, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Richard W J NeufeldDepartment of Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Rakesh JetlyThe University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Royal Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Benicio N FreyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Tomas RosDepartment of Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ruth A LaniusImaging, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Andrew A NicholsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Western University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Vienna · ATLawson Health Research Institute · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-NFB) is a non-invasive technology that enables individuals to self-regulate brain activity linked to neuropsychiatric symptoms, including those associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Selecting the target brain region for neurofeedback-mediated regulation is primarily informed by the neurobiological characteristics of the participant population. There is a strong link between PTSD symptoms and multiple functional disruptions in the brain, including hyperactivity within both the amygdala and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during trauma-related processing. As such, previous rt-fMRI-NFB studies have focused on these two target regions when training individuals with PTSD to regulate neural activity. However, the differential effects of neurofeedback target selection on PTSD-related neural activity and clinical outcomes have not previously been investigated. Methods: Here, we compared whole-brain activation and changes in PTSD symptoms between PTSD participants ( Results: For the PCC as compared to the amygdala group, we observed decreased neural activity in several regions implicated in PTSD psychopathology - namely, the bilateral cuneus/precuneus/primary visual cortex, the left superior parietal lobule, the left occipital pole, and the right superior temporal gyrus/temporoparietal junction (TPJ) - during target region downregulation using rt-fMRI-NFB. Conversely, for the amygdala as compared to the PCC group, there were no unique (i.e., over and above that of the PCC group) decreases in neural activity. Importantly, amygdala downregulation was not associated with significantly improved PTSD symptoms, whereas PCC downregulation was associated with reduced reliving and distress symptoms over the course of this single training session. In this pilot analysis, we did not detect significant between-group differences in state PTSD symptoms during neurofeedback. As a critical control, the PCC and amygdala groups did not differ in their ability to downregulate activity within their respective target brain regions. This indicates that subsequent whole-brain neural activation results can be attributed to the effects of the neurofeedback target region selection in terms of neurophysiological function, rather than as a result of group differences in regulatory success. Conclusion: In this study, neurofeedback-mediated downregulation of the PCC was differentially associated with reduced state PTSD symptoms and simultaneous decreases in PTSD-associated brain activity during a single training session. This novel analysis may guide researchers in choosing a neurofeedback target region in future rt-fMRI-NFB studies and help to establish the clinical efficacy of specific neurofeedback targets for PTSD. A future multi-session clinical trial of rt-fMRI-NFB that directly compares between PCC and amygdala target regions is warranted.

Indexed as

amygdaladefault mode networkfMRI neurofeedbackposterior cingulate cortexpost-traumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID38094001
PMCPMC10716260
OpenAlexW4389151592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.