ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Corticosteroid treatment prediction using chest X-ray and clinical data.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Approaches in Drug Repositioning Highlight Ouabain and Helenalin as Potential Drug Candidates for Pulmonary Fibrosis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Enhancing surgical object detection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with explicit positional relationship modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Severe courses of COVID-19 disease can lead to long-term complications. The post-acute phase of COVID-19 refers to the persistent or new symptoms. This problem is becoming more relevant with the increasing number of patients who have contracted COVID-19 and the emergence of new virus variants. In this case, preventive treatment with corticosteroids can be applied. However, not everyone benefits from the treatment, moreover, it can have severe side effects. Currently, no study would analyze who benefits from the treatment. Methods: This work introduces a novel approach to the recommendation of Corticosteroid (CS) treatment for patients in the post-acute phase. We have used a novel combination of clinical data, including blood tests, spirometry, and X-ray images from 273 patients. These are very challenging to collect, especially from patients in the post-acute phase of COVID-19. To our knowledge, no similar dataset exists in the literature. Moreover, we have proposed a unique methodology that combines machine learning and deep learning models based on Vision Transformer (ViT) and InceptionNet, preprocessing techniques, and pretraining strategies to deal with the specific characteristics of our data. Results: The experiments have proved that combining clinical data with CXR images achieves 8% higher accuracy than independent analysis of CXR images. The proposed method reached 80.0% accuracy (78.7% balanced accuracy) and a ROC-AUC of 0.89. Conclusions: The introduced system for CS treatment prediction using our neural network and learning algorithm is unique in this field of research. Here, we have shown the efficiency of using mixed data and proved it on real-world data. The paper also introduces the factors that could be used to predict long-term complications. Additionally, this system was deployed to the hospital environment as a recommendation tool, which admits the clinical application of the proposed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.