ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2023
α-Ethyltryptamine: A Ratiocinatory Review of a Forgotten Antidepressant.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
α-Ethyltryptamine (AET) is quite an interesting, but perhaps long-forgotten, centrally acting agent. Known for more than 75 years, AET was once clinically available as an antidepressant but was withdrawn shortly after its introduction. AET was subsequently controlled as a U.S. Schedule I substance due to its perceived abuse liability and/or toxicity but remains an agent of interest. Hallucinogenic tryptamines (that is, serotonergic psychedelic agents) are now in vogue as novel and exciting chemotherapeutics for the treatment of various neuropsychiatric disorders, including treatment-resistant depression and anxiety. Does AET represent a serotonergic psychedelic agent? Does AET (or its analogs) deserve further investigation? Here, the history of AET is critically reviewed in detail, and an argument is made that AET might have been an agent well ahead of its time. It possesses many of the hallmarks of an antidepressant, suggesting that AET derivatives and particularly their optical isomers are deserving of further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.