Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38093816›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2023

Cheminformatics and artificial intelligence for accelerating agrochemical discovery.

Yannick Djoumbou-Feunang, Jeremy Wilmot, John Kinney, Pritam Chanda, Pulan Yu, Avery Sader, Max Sharifi, Scott Smith, Junjun Ou, Jie Hu and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yannick Djoumbou-FeunangCorteva Agriscience, Farming Solutions and Digital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Jeremy WilmotCorteva Agriscience, Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
John KinneyCorteva Agriscience, Farming Solutions and Digital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Pritam ChandaCorteva Agriscience, Farming Solutions and Digital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Pulan YuCorteva Agriscience, Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Avery SaderCorteva Agriscience, Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Max SharifiCorteva Agriscience, Regulatory and Stewardship, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Scott SmithCorteva Agriscience, Farming Solutions and Digital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Junjun OuCorteva Agriscience, Crop Protection Discovery and Development, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Jie HuCorteva Agriscience, Farming Solutions and Digital, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Elizabeth ShippCorteva Agriscience UK Limited, Regulation Innovation Center, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Dirk Tomandl *Atomwise, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Siva P Kumpatla *Karyosoft Inc, Carmel, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global cost-benefit analysis of pesticide use during the last 30 years has been characterized by a significant increase during the period from 1990 to 2007 followed by a decline. This observation can be attributed to several factors including, but not limited to, pest resistance, lack of novelty with respect to modes of action or classes of chemistry, and regulatory action. Due to current and projected increases of the global population, it is evident that the demand for food, and consequently, the usage of pesticides to improve yields will increase. Addressing these challenges and needs while promoting new crop protection agents through an increasingly stringent regulatory landscape requires the development and integration of infrastructures for innovative, cost- and time-effective discovery and development of novel and sustainable molecules. Significant advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and cheminformatics over the last two decades have improved the decision-making power of research scientists in the discovery of bioactive molecules. AI- and cheminformatics-driven molecule discovery offers the opportunity of moving experiments from the greenhouse to a virtual environment where thousands to billions of molecules can be investigated at a rapid pace, providing unbiased hypothesis for lead generation, optimization, and effective suggestions for compound synthesis and testing. To date, this is illustrated to a far lesser extent in the publicly available agrochemical research literature compared to drug discovery. In this review, we provide an overview of the crop protection discovery pipeline and how traditional, cheminformatics, and AI technologies can help to address the needs and challenges of agrochemical discovery towards rapidly developing novel and more sustainable products.

Indexed as

agrochemicalsartificial intelligencecheminformaticsDMTA cyclelead generationlead optimizationmachine learningsustainability

Identifiers

PMID38093816
PMCPMC10716421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.