ArticlePorto biomedical journal
Percutaneous gastrostomies in advanced cancer.
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrostomies can be performed percutaneously by interventional radiology (PRG) or endoscopy (PEG). Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with advanced cancer who underwent a gastrostomy in 2017 in an oncology center. Results: In 2017, 164 patients underwent gastrostomies, and 137 (84%) were male. The median age was 60 years (range: 38-91). The predominant Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status stage was 1, with 73 (45%) patients. Head and neck cancer was the most common diagnosis, with 127 (77%) cases. The most frequent reason for performing a gastrostomy was dysphagia, 132 (81%). Most gastrostomies were PEG, 121 (74%), followed by PRG, 41 (25%), and surgery, 2 (1%). Early complications occurred in 86 (52%) patients, and the most frequent of them were local pain in 69 (80%) patients and minor local bleeding in 13 (15%). Late complications occurred in 90 (55%) patients, and the most frequent was also local pain in 57 (63%) patients, followed by local infection in 8 (9%), tube extrusion in 7 (8%), and stomal leakage in 7 (8%). In the multivariable analysis, the factors associated with survival were lymph node metastases and the ECOG performance status. Until June 30th, 2022, 123 (75%) patients had died, and 41 (25%) were still alive. Conclusion: Gastrostomies were performed predominantly in ECOG performance stage 1 patients with head and neck cancer and symptoms of dysphagia, and PEG was the most common procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.