ReviewHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2023
A Literature Review on the Adherence to Screening Guidelines for Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Persons Living With HIV.
Review in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection increases the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Although antiretroviral therapy decreases the progression of LTBI to tuberculosis disease (TBD), persons living with HIV (PLHIV) still have higher risk of TBD compared to the general population. LTBI screening is recommended for all newly diagnosed PLHIV to prevent TBD. However, several studies from low TBD incidence countries have reported sub-optimal implementation of these guidelines. This review aims to assess published studies on adherence to LTBI screening among PLHIV by identifying factors and determinants that affect the implementation of LTBI screening among PLHIV in low TBD incidence countries. Electronic databases were used to search for articles describing the adherence to LTBI screening guidelines. Fourteen studies were included in the final review. Ten studies assessed the frequency of PLHIV getting LTBI screening, and 4 studies assessed the compliance of health care providers in implementing the guidelines. PLHIV who were screened for LTBI ranged from 22.4% to 85%, of which 0.8% to 25.6% had positive results. Only 20% to 57.4% of surveyed physicians implemented the guidelines. Country of birth was an independent predictor of receiving LTBI screening. LTBI screening guidelines are inconsistently performed resulting in missed opportunities for TBD prevention. A comprehensive screening policy involving testing all PLHIV may be the best approach, rather than a targeted approach testing foreign-born individuals only. This will minimize missing domestic cases that can worsen disparity in HIV and tuberculosis infection among minority groups, including Asians, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38093759PMC10713737W4389799232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.