ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Clinical Functional Seizure Score (CFSS): a simple algorithm for clinicians to suspect functional seizures.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Distinguishing functional seizures (FS) from epileptic seizures (ES) poses a challenge due to similar clinical manifestations. The creation of a clinical scoring system that assists in accurately diagnosing patients with FS would be a valuable contribution to medical practice. This score has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making and facilitate prompt diagnosis of patients with FS. Methods: Participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three distinct groups: training, validation, and test cohorts. Demographic and semiological variables were analyzed in the training cohort by univariate analyses. Variables that showed a significant difference between FS and ES were then further scrutinized in two multivariate logistic regression models. The CFSS was developed based on the odds ratio of the discriminating variables. Using the validation group, the optimal cutoff value was determined based on the AUC, and then the CFSS was evaluated in the test cohort to assess its performance. Results: The developed score yielded an AUC of 0.78 in the validation cohort, and a cutoff point of 6 was established with a focus on maximizing sensitivity without significantly compromising specificity. The score was then applied in the test cohort, where it achieved a sensitivity of 86.96% and a specificity of 73.81%. Conclusion: We have developed a new tool that shows promising results in identifying patients suspicious of FS. With further analysis through prospective studies, this innovative, simple tool can be integrated into the diagnostic process of FS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.