Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38093374›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Body-weight support gait training in neurological intensive care: safety, feasibility, and delays before walking with or without suspension.

Claire Jourdan, Fanny Pradalier, Kevin Chalard, Margrit Ascher, Francisco Miron Duran, Frédérique Pavillard, Frédéric Greco, Myriam Mellouk, Stéphane Fournier, Flora Djanikian and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04300491 (Monocentric Descriptive Study Focuses on the Feasibility, Safety and Benefits of Using a Specific Suspension Walking Device for Patients With Neurological Damage), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04300491 completednot on this map

Monocentric Descriptive Study Focuses on the Feasibility, Safety and Benefits of Using a Specific Suspension Walking Device for Patients With Neurological Damage

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2020 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsStroke, Traumatic Brain Injury, Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury, Other Brain InjuriesArmsSuspension walking training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Claire JourdanDépartement de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Site Lapeyronie, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295, Montpellier cedex 5, France. cl-jourdan@chu-montpellier.fr.
Fanny PradalierDépartement de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Site Lapeyronie, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Kevin ChalardDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Margrit AscherDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Francisco Miron DuranDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frédérique PavillardDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric GrecoDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Myriam MelloukDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Stéphane FournierDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Flora DjanikianDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Isabelle LaffontDépartement de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Site Lapeyronie, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Anthony GelisDépartement de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Site Lapeyronie, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Pierre-François PerrigaultDépartement d'anesthésie-Réanimation Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly Mobilization in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) enhances patients' evolution, but has been rarely studied in neurological ICUs. The aim of this study was to assess gait training with body-weight support (BWS) in neuroICU, and to report on its safety, feasibility and on delays before walking with and without BWS.

methodsThis study was an observational one-year single-center study. Inclusion criteria were adults with a neurological injury requiring mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were early death or ICU transfer. After weaning from ventilation, patients were screened for indications of BWS walking using predefined criteria.

resultsPatients' conditions were mostly brain injuries: 32% subarachnoid hemorrhages, 42% focal strokes, and 12% traumatic brain injuries. Out of 272 admissions, 136 patients were excluded, 78 were eligible, and 33 performed BWS walking. Among non-eligible patients, 36 walked unsuspended upon ventilation weaning, 17 presented too severe impairments. Among the 45 eligible patients who did not receive BWS training, main reasons were workload and weekends (31%), medical barriers (29%), and early ICU discharge (22%). 78 BWS sessions were performed on the 33 beneficiaries (median sessions per patient 2, max 10). Pre-session, most patients had inadequate response to pain, orders, or simple orientation questions. Sitting without support was impossible for 74%. Most pre-post changes in hemodynamic, respiratory, and pain parameters were small, and recovered spontaneously after the session. Eight sessions were interrupted; reasons were pain, fatigue or major imbalance (4), syncope (1), occurrence of stool (2), and battery failure (1). None of these adverse events required medical intervention, patients recovered upon session interruption. Median session duration was 31 min, patients walked on median 17 m. First BWS session occurred on median 3 days after ventilation weaning, and 11 days before patients were able to walk unsuspended.

conclusionsVerticalization and walking using a suspension device in patients in neuroICU allows early gait training, despite challenging neurological impairments. It is safe and generally well tolerated.

trial registrationClinicalTrials database (ID: NCT04300491).

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAdultCritical CareFeasibility StudiesHumansPainBody weight supportBrain injuryEarly mobilizationNeurocritical careRehabilitationVerticalization

Identifiers

PMID38093374
PMCPMC10720049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.