Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38093337›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2023

O-GlcNAcylation: the sweet side of epigenetics.

Thomas Dupas, Benjamin Lauzier, Serge McGraw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Maternal O-GlcNAc Transferase Is Required for the Asymmetry of Epigenetic Modifications in Mouse Zygotes.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. HumanResearch square · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Insights into O-GlcNAcylation and programmed cell death in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas DupasCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Canada. thomasdupas.pro@gmail.com.
Benjamin LauzierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Canada.
Serge McGrawCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Canada. serge.mcgraw@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histones display a wide variety of post-translational modifications, including acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation. These epigenetic modifications can influence chromatin structure and function without altering the DNA sequence. Histones can also undergo post-translational O-GlcNAcylation, a rather understudied modification that plays critical roles in almost all biological processes and is added and removed by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase and O-GlcNAcase, respectively. This review provides a current overview of our knowledge of how O-GlcNAcylation impacts the histone code both directly and by regulating other chromatin modifying enzymes. This highlights the pivotal emerging role of O-GlcNAcylation as an essential epigenetic marker.

Indexed as

HistonesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticPhosphorylationChromatinHistonesEpigeneticsHistone modificationO-GlcNAcylation

Identifiers

PMID38093337
PMCPMC10720106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.