Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023
Symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia, efficiency, and safety of swallowing in patients after treatment for head and neck cancer.
Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the relation between symptoms and signs of oropharyngeal dysphagia after treatment for head and neck cancer.
methodsAn observational analytical study with retrospective and prospective components was carried out including 25 adult and elderly patients with head and neck cancer who had completed the treatment at least 3 months before data collection. Data from the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) protocol were analyzed, as well as from the videofluoroscopic swallowing exams. Based on videofluoroscopy, the degree of oropharyngeal dysphagia was classified, as well as the safety and efficiency grade using the DIGEST (Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity) scale. Pearson's correlation test was applied, adopting a significance level of 5%.
resultsThere was a significant correlation between question 4 of the EAT-10 (swallowing solids takes extra effort) and the efficiency profile (p = 0.004), as well as between question 4 and the DIGEST score (p = 0.002). No significant relation was found between the DIGEST score and EAT-10 total score (p = 0.180) and not even between EAT-10 total score and efficiency (p = 0.129) or safety grade (p = 0.878).
conclusionIn conclusion, no relation was found between most of the dysphagia signs and symptoms investigated, demonstrating that the individual's perception of the swallowing function may not be consistent with the findings of the instrumental evaluation after long-term treatment for head and neck cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.