Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38093035›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Developing an international concept-based curriculum for pharmacology education: The promise of core concepts and concept inventories.

Clare Guilding, Roisin Kelly-Laubscher, Adeladlew Netere, Anna-Marie Babey, Carolina Restini, Margaret Cunningham, John P Kelly, Jennifer Koenig, Kelly Karpa, Martin Hawes and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reflections on the Core Concepts of Physiology and Pharmacology.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025
    Review
  9. Intelligent Assessment Systems in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Clare GuildingSchool of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Roisin Kelly-LaubscherDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6379-9943
Adeladlew NetereFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anna-Marie BabeyFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Carolina RestiniPharmacology and Toxicology Department, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, Clinton Township, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5158-485X
Margaret CunninghamStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
John P KellyPharmacology & Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Jennifer KoenigDivision of Medical Sciences & Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-834X
Kelly KarpaDepartment of Medical Education & Family Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA.
Martin HawesSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guilford, Surrey, UK.
Steven J TuckerSchool of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Thomas A AngeloEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Paul J WhiteFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-1808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years, studies have shown that science and health profession graduates demonstrate gaps in their fundamental pharmacology knowledge and ability to apply pharmacology concepts in practice. This article reviews the current challenges faced by pharmacology educators, including the exponential growth in discipline knowledge and competition for curricular time. We then argue that pharmacology education should focus on essential concepts that enable students to develop beyond 'know' towards 'know how to'. A concept-based approach will help educators prioritize and benchmark their pharmacology curriculum, facilitate integration of pharmacology with other disciplines in the curriculum, create alignment between universities and improve application of pharmacology knowledge to professional contexts such as safe prescribing practices. To achieve this, core concepts first need to be identified and unpacked, and methods for teaching and assessment using concept inventories developed. The International Society for Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Education Section (IUPHAR-Ed) Core Concepts of Pharmacology (CCP) initiative involves over 300 educators from the global pharmacology community. CCP has identified and defined the core concepts of pharmacology, together with key underpinning sub-concepts. To realize these benefits, pharmacology educators must develop methods to teach and assess core concepts. Work to develop concept inventories is ongoing, including identifying student misconceptions of the core concepts and creating a bank of multiple-choice questions to assess student understanding. Future work aims to develop and validate materials and methods to help educators embed core concepts within curricula. Potential strategies that educators can use to overcome factors that inhibit adoption of core concepts are presented.

Indexed as

CurriculumPharmacologyConcept FormationHumanscore conceptshealth professions educationpharmacology educationscience education

Identifiers

PMID38093035
PMCPMC12304839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.