ArticleGeroScience2024
Prediction of 1-year change in knee extension strength by neuromuscular properties in older adults.
Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential effects of aerobic, resistance, and combined exercise on skeletal muscle function in high-fat diet-induced obese mice: integration of gut microbiota and metabolomics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Sex disparities of human neuromuscular decline in older humans.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Skeletal muscle dysfunction with advancing age.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Improving muscle strength and preventing muscle weakness are important for older adults. The change in strength can be effectively explained by skeletal muscle mass and neural factors. Neural factors are important for older adults because the variation of neural components is greater in older than in young adults, and any decline in strength cannot solely be explained by a decrease in skeletal muscle mass. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether skeletal muscle mass or motor unit firing properties could explain the change in muscle strength after 1 year. Thirty-eight older adults (75.0 ± 4.7 years, 156.6 ± 7.7 cm, 55.5 ± 9.4 kg, 26 women) performed maximum voluntary knee extension and their skeletal muscle mass was measured using a bioimpedance device. During a submaximal contraction task, high-density surface electromyography was recorded and the signals were decomposed into individual motor unit firing. As an index of motor unit firing properties, the slope and y-intercept (MU intercept) were calculated from the regression line between recruitment thresholds and firing rates in each participant. After 1 year, their maximum knee extension torque was evaluated again. A stepwise multiple regression linear model with sex and age as covariates indicated that MU intercept was a significant explanation with a negative association for the 1-year change in muscle strength (β = - 0.493, p = 0.004), but not skeletal muscle mass (p = 0.364). The results suggest that neural components might be predictors of increasing and decreasing muscle strength rather than skeletal muscle mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.