ArticleScientific reports2023
Surface defect detection of industrial components based on vision.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of nanosensors and nanomaterials to revolutionize the food industry: boosting product safety, quality, and sustainability.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Deep learning enabled intelligent robotic system for aeroengine blade surface inspection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MSFE-YOLO: A Steel Surface Defect Detection Algorithm Integrating Multi-Scale Frequency Domain and Defect-Aware Attention.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Proposal for Computationally Efficient Fog Computing System for Coffee Berry Borer Detection via Optimized YOLOv26.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SD-IDD: Selective Distillation for Incremental Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A prototype-aligned multi-scale attention network for few-shot industrial surface defect detection.PloS one · 2026Article
- Enhanced Vision-Based Quality Inspection: A Multiview Artificial Intelligence Framework for Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A novel method for estrous cycle staging using supervised object detection.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2025Article
- Efficient deep learning based rail fastener screw detection method for fastener screw maintenance robot under complex lighting conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhanced photovoltaic panel defect detection via adaptive complementary fusion in YOLO-ACF.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- DG2GAN: improving defect recognition performance with generated defect image sample.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and effective surface defect detection in industrial components can avoid the occurrence of serious safety hazards. Since most industrial component surfaces have tiny defects with high similarity to the detection background, there are often issues of missed or false detections when defects are detected, leading to low detection accuracy. To deal with the aforementioned issue, this essay suggests a high-precision detection model for surface defects in industrial components based on the YOLOv5 algorithm. First, the original spatial pyramid pooling (SPPF) is innovated by proposing the SPPFKCSPC module, which improves the network's capacity for feature extraction from targets at different scales and fuses multiscale features better. Then, C3 is combined with SPPFKCSPC and replaces the C3 module of the backbone network, which improves feature expression and enhances the receptive field of the network. Finally, the coordinate attention mechanism (CA) has been embedded into the YOLOv5 neck network, and the bounding box regression loss function of the algorithm is improved to EIOU, not only improving the precision of the target localization and recognition model but also enhancing the overall network performance. Based on the public datasets NEU-DET and PV-Multi-Defect, multiple sets of experiments were conducted using innovative algorithms. On the NEU-DET dataset, we got a mean average accuracy (mAP) of 88.3%, which is 7.2% greater than the original approach. On the PV-Multi-Defect dataset, the mAP value reached 97.5%, an improvement of 1.5%. As shown by the experimental data, the detection results significantly improved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.