Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38092862›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2023

Observation of the validity of the upper lip bite test in predicting difficult intubation.

Xinyuan Tang, Zhiyuan Dong, Jianling Xu, Pingping Cheng, Mingfang Wang, Bin Wang, Xiaogan Jiang, Weidong Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Trends in Preoperative Airway Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyuan Tang *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Zhiyuan Dong *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Jianling XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Pingping ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Mingfang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Xiaogan JiangAnhui Province Clinical Research Center for Critical Care Medicine (Respiratory Disease), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
Weidong YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China. yaowdmd@163.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CN

Funding

Department of Education of Anhui Province No. 2022AH040169Department of Science and Technology of Anhui Province No. 201904b11020014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The upper lip bite test (ULBT) is considered an effective method for predicting difficult airways, but data on the ULBT for predicting difficult tracheal intubation are lacking. This study aimed to examine the clinical utility of the ULBT in predicting difficult endotracheal intubation. We conducted an observational case-cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective surgery and requiring endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia. Difficult airway assessment was performed on the recruited patients before the operation, including the ULBT, mouth opening, thyromental distance, modified Mallampati test, and body mass index. The primary outcome was the incidence of difficult tracheal intubation. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare the performance of variables in predicting difficult tracheal intubation. We successfully recruited 2522 patients for analysis and observed 64 patients with difficult tracheal intubation. When predicting difficult tracheal intubation, grade 2 ULBT had a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.54, and grade 3 had a sensitivity of 0.28 and a specificity of 0.75. Compared with mouth opening, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ULBT was lower in predicting difficult tracheal intubation (0.69 [95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.71] vs. 0.84 [95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.87], P < 0.05).Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR-ROC-16009050, principal investigator: Weidong Yao.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopyLipAdultCohort StudiesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38092862
PMCPMC10719328
OpenAlexW4389671771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.