ArticleScientific reports2023
Ultrasound performance in pediatric deep soft-tissue tumor characterization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of sclerotherapy with pingyangmycin and polidocanol for venous malformations.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Sonographic Scoring System in Predicting the Malignant Potential of a Soft-tissue Swelling.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the performance of ultrasonography in diagnosing deep soft-tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions in children with histological results. Demographic information and ultrasound characteristics of benign and malignant masses were statistically analyzed. Three radiologists (Radiologists 1, 2, and 3) independently reviewed the ultrasonography studies while being blinded to the medical history and other imaging findings. The 82 lesions included in the study were histopathologically classified as malignant (n = 25) or benign (n = 57). No statistically significant differences were observed between the benign and malignant subgroups regarding age (p = 0.059), sex (p = 1.0), disease course (p = 0.812), presence or absence of symptoms (p = 0.534), maximum diameter (p = 0.359), margin (p = 1.0), calcification (p = 0.057), or blood Adler type (p = 0.563). However, statistically significant differences were observed between the benign and malignant subgroups in terms of isolated or Multiple occurrences (p < 0.001), history of malignancy (p < 0.001), shape (p < 0.001), and echogenicity (p < 0.001). Parameters such as tumor shape (p = 0.042, OR = 6.222), single or multiple occurrences (p = 0.008, OR = 17.000), and history of malignancy (p = 0.038, OR = 13.962) were identified as independent predictors of benign and malignant tumors. The diagnostic sensitivities evaluated by the three radiologists were 68.0%, 72.0%, 96.0%, respectively, while the specificities were 77.2%, 82.5%, 77.2%, respectively. Ultrasound demonstrates good performance in the diagnosis of benign deep lesions such as hemangiomas/venous malformation and adipocytic tumors. Multiple irregular morphologies and a history of malignancy were identified as independent risk factors for malignant masses. The experience of radiologists in recognizing specific tumors is important. Careful attention should be paid to masses with ambiguous ultrasound features, as well as small lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.