Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38092686›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

A scoping review of empathy recognition in text using natural language processing.

Vishal Anand Shetty, Shauna Durbin, Meghan S Weyrich, Airín Denise Martínez, Jing Qian, David L Chin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishal Anand ShettyDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.
Shauna DurbinCenter for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, United States.
Meghan S WeyrichCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95616, United States.
Airín Denise MartínezDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.
Jing QianDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.
David L ChinDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2341-6207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide a scoping review of studies on empathy recognition in text using natural language processing (NLP) that can inform an approach to identifying physician empathic communication over patient portal messages. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched 6 databases to identify relevant studies published through May 1, 2023. The study selection was conducted through a title screening, an abstract review, and a full-text review. Our process followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

resultsOf the 2446 publications identified from our searches, 39 studies were selected for the final review, which summarized: (1) definitions and context of empathy, (2) data sources and tested models, and (3) model performance. Definitions of empathy varied in their specificity to the context and setting of the study. The most common settings in which empathy was studied were reactions to news stories, health-related social media forums, and counseling sessions. We also observed an expected shift in methods used that coincided with the introduction of transformer-based models. DISCUSSION: Aspects of the current approaches taken across various domains may be translatable to communication over a patient portal. However, the specific barriers to identifying empathic communication in this context are unclear. While modern NLP methods appear to be able to handle empathy-related tasks, challenges remain in precisely defining and measuring empathy in text.

conclusionExisting work that has attempted to measure empathy in text using NLP provides a useful basis for future studies of patient-physician asynchronous communication, but consideration for the conceptualization of empathy is needed.

Indexed as

EmpathyNatural Language ProcessingCommunicationHumansPatient PortalsPhysician-Patient Relationscommunicationempathymachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38092686
PMCPMC10873831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.