Correction of phase offset errors and quantification of background noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and encoded-displacement uncertainty on DENSE MRI for kinematics of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta.

Displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MRI is a phase contrast technique that allows the encoding of tissue displacement into the phase of the magnetic resonance signal. Recent developments in this technique allow the imaging of relatively thin structures such as the aortic wall. Quantifying background noise associated to DENSE MRI is required to assess the uncertainty of derived displacement measurements and for the design and implementation of adequate noise-reduction techniques. Although noise and error management of cardiac DENSE MRI has been previously studied, developments for aortic applications are scarce. Herein, we evaluate the noise and uncertainty of DENSE MRI scans at three different locations along the descending aorta: the distal aortic arch (DAA), the descending thoracic aorta (DTA), and infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA). Additionally, we analyze three datasets from in vitro validation experiments with polyvinyl alcohol phantoms. We implement and evaluate the effectiveness of an offset-error correction algorithm and noise filtering techniques on DENSE MRI for aortic motion applications. Our results show that the phase signal of pixels composing the static background was normally distributed, centered on average at 0.003 ± 0.02 rad and - 0.02 ± 0.024 rad for each phase directions, suggesting that background noise is random, isotropic, and DENSE MRI has little offset errors. However, background signal noise significantly increased with elapsed time of the cardiac cycle; and was spatially heterogeneous consistently increased towards the anterior space. Background noise showed no significant differences between the 3 aortic locations and the in vitro experiments. However, SNR depended on the displacement of the region of interest, in consequence it was found significantly larger at DAA (16.7 ± 8.5, p = 0.003) and DTA (15.4 ± 7.6, p = 0.008) than at the IAA (8.0 ± 4.1), but not significantly different than the SNR of in vitro experiments (8.0 ± 3.7), and had an overall average of 13 ± 7. The applied methods significantly reduced the offset error and effect of noise on the estimation of encoded displacements. Finally, this analysis suggests that the implemented DENSE MRI protocol is adequate to assess the motion of healthy human aortas. However, the relative effect of noise increased considerably on the analysis of an ageing or diseased aortas with impaired mobility, calling for further analyses on pathologically stiffened aortas.