Trial reportJournal of travel medicine2024
A randomized, double-blinded Phase 3 study to demonstrate lot-to-lot consistency and to confirm immunogenicity and safety of the live-attenuated chikungunya virus vaccine candidate VLA1553 in healthy adults†.
Trial report in Journal of travel medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A single-dose chimeric Newcastle disease virus (NDV)/chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is an effective CHIKV vaccine candidate.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- Chikungunya Vaccines in Travel Medicine: From Regulatory Approval to Real-World Challenges.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Mapping Human Clinical Evidence for Chikungunya Vaccines: A Scoping Review of Immunogenicity, Durability, and Safety.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Type I IFN autoantibodies underlie chikungunya live-attenuated vaccine encephalitis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Attenuated viral strains of priority pathogens for potential use in controlled human infection model studies: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- γδ T Cells Mediate Protective Immunity Following Vaccination with an Insect-Based Chikungunya Fever Vaccine in Mice.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Modeling the impact of vaccine campaigns on the epidemic transmission dynamics of chikungunya virus outbreaks.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in Viroporin Function and Structure: A Comparative Analysis of Alphavirus 6K with Well-Characterized Viroporins.Viruses · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Assessment of Reactogenicity and Safety of the Live-Attenuated Chikungunya Vaccine (IXCHIQVaccines · 2025Article
- Assessment of the transmission of live-attenuated chikungunya virus vaccine VLA1553 by Aedes albopictus mosquitoes.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- CHIKV mRNA vaccines encoding conserved structural/envelope proteins confer broad cross-lineage protection against infection.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- A safe insect-based chikungunya fever vaccine affords rapid and durable protection in cynomolgus macaques.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- From bench to clinic: the development of VLA1553/IXCHIQ, a live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine.Journal of travel medicine · 2024Review
- From bench to clinic: the development of VLA1553/IXCHIQ, a live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine.Journal of travel medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Chikungunya Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Article
- Enhanced attenuation of chikungunya vaccines expressing antiviral cytokines.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global spread of the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) increases the exposure risk for individuals travelling to or living in endemic areas. This Phase 3 study was designed to demonstrate manufacturing consistency between three lots of the single shot live-attenuated CHIKV vaccine VLA1553, and to confirm the promising immunogenicity and safety data obtained in previous trials.
methodsThis randomized, double-blinded, lot-to-lot consistency, Phase 3 study, assessed immunogenicity and safety of VLA1553 in 408 healthy adults (18-45 years) in 12 sites across the USA. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios of CHIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies between three VLA1553 lots at 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity and safety over 6 months post-vaccination.
resultsGMTs were comparable between the lots meeting the acceptance criteria for equivalence. The average GMT (measured by 50% CHIKV micro plaque neutralization test; μPRNT50) peaked with 2643 at 28 days post-vaccination and decreased to 709 at 6 months post-vaccination. An excellent seroresponse rate (defined as μPRNT50 titre ≥ 150 considered protective) was achieved in 97.8% of participants at 28 days post-vaccination and still persisted in 96% at 6 months after vaccination. Upon VLA1553 immunization, 72.5% of participants experienced adverse events (AEs), without significant differences between lots (related solicited systemic AE: 53.9% of participants; related solicited local AE: 19.4%). Overall, AEs were mostly mild or moderate and resolved without sequela, usually within 3 days. With 3.9% of participants experiencing severe AEs, 2.7% were classified as related, whereas none of the six reported serious adverse events was related to the administration of VLA1553.
conclusionsAll three lots of VLA1553 recapitulated the safety and immunogenicity profiles of a preceding Phase 3 study, fulfilling pre-defined consistency requirements. These results highlight the manufacturability of VLA1553, a promising vaccine for the prevention of CHIKV disease for those living in or travelling to endemic areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.