ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2024
Circadian regulation of physiology by disordered protein-protein interactions.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in circadian rhythms research in fungi since the millenium.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2026Review
- Disordered but rhythmic-the role of intrinsic protein disorder in eukaryotic circadian timing.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Regulatory links between the circadian clock and stress-induced biomolecular condensates.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2025Review
- Interconnections of screen time with neuroinflammation.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular circadian clocks, the molecular timers that coordinate physiology to the day/night cycle across the domains of life, are widely regulated by disordereddisordered protein interactions. Here, we review the disordered-disordered protein interactions in the circadian clock of Neurospora crassa (N. crassa), a filamentous fungus which is a model organism for clocks in higher eukaryotes. We focus on what is known about the interactions between the intrinsically disordered core negative arm protein FREQUENCEY (FRQ), the other proteins comprising the transcription-translation feedback loop, and the proteins that control output. We compare and contrast this model with other models of eukaryotic clocks, illustrating that protein disorder is a conserved and essential mechanism in the maintenance of circadian clock across species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.