ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2023
Comparing the EMMA capnograph with sidestream capnography and arterial carbon dioxide pressure at 284 kPa.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a prior hypercapnia experience on recognition of hypercapnia in divers: a randomised controlled study.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2026Trial
- Enhancing Adult Asthma Management: A Review on the Utility of Remote Home Spirometry and Mobile Applications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Capnography aids assessment of the adequacy of mechanical patient ventilation. Physical and physiological changes in hyperbaric environments create ventilation challenges which make end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO Methods: We compared the EMMA capnograph to sidestream capnography and the gold standard arterial carbon dioxide blood gas analysis in a hyperbaric chamber. In 12 resting subjects breathing air at 284 kPa, we recorded ETCO Results: Across all measurements there was a difference of about 0.1 kPa between the EMMA and sidestream capnographs indicating a very slight over-estimation of ETCO Conclusions: In this study, the EMMA capnograph performed equally to the sidestream capnograph when compared directly, and both capnography measures gave clinically acceptable estimates of arterial PCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.