Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091377›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2023

Pediatric Delirium Educational Tool Development With Intensive Care Unit Clinicians and Caregivers in Canada: Focus Group Study.

Michael Wood, Kavi Gandhi, Andrea Chapman, Peter Skippen, Gordon Krahn, Matthias Görges, S Evelyn Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sedation in Critically Ill Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael WoodBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-8320
Kavi GandhiBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7560-8528
Andrea ChapmanBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-2862
Peter SkippenBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-0381
Gordon KrahnBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-129X
Matthias GörgesBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-178X
S Evelyn StewartBC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-6383
University of British Columbia · CABC Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)-associated delirium contributes to a decline in postdischarge quality of life, with worse outcomes for individuals with delayed identification. As delirium screening rates remain low within PICUs, caregivers may be able to assist with early detection, for which they need more education, as awareness of pediatric delirium among caregivers remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to develop an educational tool for caregivers to identify potential delirium symptoms during their child's PICU stay, educate them on how to best support their child if they experience delirium, and guide them to relevant family resources. Methods: Web-based focus groups were conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital with expected end users of the tool (ie, PICU health care professionals and caregivers of children with an expected PICU length of stay of over 48 h) to identify potential educational information for inclusion in a family resource guide and to identify strategies for effective implementation. Data were analyzed thematically to generate requirements to inform prototype development. Participants then provided critical feedback on the initial prototype, which guided the final design. Results: In all, 24 participants (18 health care professionals and 6 caregivers) attended 7 focus groups. Participants identified five informational sections for inclusion: (1) delirium definition, (2) key features of delirium (signs and symptoms), (3) postdischarge outcomes associated with delirium, (4) tips to inform family-centered care, and (5) education or supportive resources. Participants identified seven design requirements: information should (1) be presented in an order that resembles the structure of the clinical discussion around delirium; (2) increase accessibility, recall, and preparedness by providing multiple formats; (3) aim to reduce stress by implementing positive framing; (4) minimize cognitive load to ensure adequate information processing; (5) provide supplemental electronic resources via QR codes; (6) emphasize collaboration between caregivers and the health care team; and (7) use prompting questions to act as a call to action for caregivers. Conclusions: Key design requirements derived from end-user feedback were established and guided the development of a novel pediatric delirium education tool. Implementing this tool into regular practice has the potential to reduce distress and assist in the early recognition and treatment of delirium in the PICU domain. Future evaluation of its clinical utility is necessary.

Indexed as

Canadacaregiverchildchildrenclinical utilitycognitiondevelopmenteducationeducationaleducational toolend usersfamily resourcefocus groups, prototypingintensive care unitpediatric delirium educationpediatric ICUpediatric intensive care unitPICUquality of lifetoolusers

Identifiers

PMID38091377
PMCPMC10734902
OpenAlexW4388657293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.