Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Enhancing breast ultrasound segmentation through fine-tuning and optimization techniques: Sharp attention UNet.

Donya Khaledyan, Thomas J Marini, Timothy M Baran, Avice O'Connell, Kevin Parker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donya KhaledyanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0004-0430-8341
Thomas J MariniDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Timothy M BaranDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Avice O'ConnellDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Kevin ParkerDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Advanced Brain OCT ElastographyR21AG070331 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PARKER, KEVIN J · 2020 to 2020
$422k
The H-scan approach to classifying ultrasound echoesR21EB025290 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PARKER, KEVIN J · 2018 to 2019
$420k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG070331NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of breast ultrasound images is a crucial and challenging task in computer-aided diagnosis systems. Accurately segmenting masses in benign and malignant cases and identifying regions with no mass is a primary objective in breast ultrasound image segmentation. Deep learning (DL) has emerged as a powerful tool in medical image segmentation, revolutionizing how medical professionals analyze and interpret complex imaging data. The UNet architecture is a highly regarded and widely used DL model in medical image segmentation. Its distinctive architectural design and exceptional performance have made it popular among researchers. With the increase in data and model complexity, optimization and fine-tuning models play a vital and more challenging role than before. This paper presents a comparative study evaluating the effect of image preprocessing and different optimization techniques and the importance of fine-tuning different UNet segmentation models for breast ultrasound images. Optimization and fine-tuning techniques have been applied to enhance the performance of UNet, Sharp UNet, and Attention UNet. Building upon this progress, we designed a novel approach by combining Sharp UNet and Attention UNet, known as Sharp Attention UNet. Our analysis yielded the following quantitative evaluation metrics for the Sharp Attention UNet: the Dice coefficient, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score values obtained were 0.93, 0.99, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively. In addition, McNemar's statistical test was applied to assess significant differences between the approaches. Across a number of measures, our proposed model outperformed all other models, resulting in improved breast lesion segmentation.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedResearch PersonnelUltrasonography, Mammary

Identifiers

PMID38091358
PMCPMC10718429
OpenAlexW4389669117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.