Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091334›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

What works in engaging communities? Prioritising nutrition interventions in Burkina Faso, Ghana and South Africa.

Daniella Watson, Mary Barker, P Romuald Boua, Samuel Chatio, Adelaide Compaoré, Marion Danis, Maxwell Dalaba, Agnes Erzse, Polly Hardy-Johnson, Sarah H Kehoe and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniella WatsonSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-7495
Mary BarkerMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
P Romuald BouaClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Samuel ChatioNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Adelaide CompaoréClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Marion DanisDepartment of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Maxwell DalabaNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Agnes ErzseSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Polly Hardy-JohnsonSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sarah H KehoeSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Karen J HofmanSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Wendy T LawrenceMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Engelbert A NonterahNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Hermann SorghoClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-5152
Teurai Rwafa-PonelaSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kate A WardSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Aviva TugendhaftSAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
INPreP study group

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R018545/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Choosing All Together" (CHAT), is a community engagement tool designed to give the public a voice in how best to allocate limited resources to improve population health. This process evaluation explored the mechanisms through which CHAT generates community engagement.

methodThe CHAT tool was adapted and implemented for use in two rural communities (Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and Navrongo, Ghana) and one urban township (Soweto, South Africa) to prioritize maternal and child nutrition interventions. Community discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Twenty-two transcripts, including six each from Navrongo and Soweto and 10 from Nanoro, were analysed thematically to generate data driven codes and themes to explain mechanisms underlying the CHAT process. The process evaluation was based on the UK MRC process evaluation guidance.

resultsSeven themes describing the functions and outcomes of CHAT were identified. Themes described participants deliberating trade-offs, working together, agreeing on priorities, having a shared vision, and increasing their knowledge, also the skills of the facilitator, and a process of power sharing between participants and researchers. Participants came to an agreement of priorities when they had a shared vision. Trained facilitators are important to facilitate meaningful discussion between participants and those with lower levels of literacy to participate fully.

conclusionCHAT has been shown to be adaptable and useful in prioritising maternal and child nutrition interventions in communities in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and South Africa. Conducting CHAT in communities over a longer period and involving policy-makers would increase trust, mutual respect and develop partnerships.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationBurkina FasoChildGhanaHumansSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID38091334
PMCPMC10718458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.